0
What else can I help you with?
Books on evidence law?
Some recommended books on evidence law are "Weinstein's Federal Evidence: Commentary on Rules of Evidence for the United States Courts" by Jack B. Weinstein and Margaret A. Berger, "Evidence: Practice Under the Rules" by Christopher B. Mueller and Laird C. Kirkpatrick, and "Principles of Evidence" by Cleary, Graham, and Ham.
What is judicial evidence?
Judicial evidence refers to information or facts presented in court to support a legal argument or case. It can include documents, witnesses, testimony, or any other form of proof that helps establish the truth or validity of a claim. The use of evidence is crucial in ensuring fair and just decisions in the legal system.
List three sources of law that govern evidence?
Some states and the federal government have a standard set of evidence rules. These rules are then modified when judges rule on what the rules mean. Some states decide all evidence questions case-by-case with the highest court in the state having the final say on any question.
What is the job of appeals courts?
An Appeals court is a place where a person goes when they do not agree with the sentence they were given for a crime. The dispute will go to an appeals court and be heard by a different judge.
What were Aztec courts like?
Aztec courts were elaborate and hierarchical, with judges appointed by the ruler to preside over cases. They used a system of laws and punishments based on codices and oral tradition. Trials often involved witnesses and evidence, with the goal of reaching a fair and just resolution.
Is a polygraph admissible in Indiana?
A polygraph examination is admissible in court only by the stipulation (agreement) of both parties. This is true in all U.S. courts, not just Indiana. Polygraph evidence is seldom used in court.
What has the author Rebecca C Harris written?
Rebecca C. Harris has written: 'Black robes, white coats' -- subject(s): Admissible evidence, Evidence, Expert, Expert Evidence, Judicial discretion, State courts
When did DNA evidence become admissible in court?
In general, state and federal courts have increasingly accepted DNA evidence as admissible. The first state appellate court decision to uphold the admission of DNA evidence was in 1988 (Andrews v. Florida, 533 So. 2d 841 [Fla. App.]), and the first major federal court decision to uphold its admission occurred in Jakobetz. By the mid-1990s, most states' courts admitted DNA test results into evidence.
Are polygraph tests allowed in New York courts?
Polygraph tests are generally not admissible as evidence in New York courts. The state considers them unreliable and lacks sufficient scientific validation for their results to be deemed credible in legal proceedings. However, they may be used in certain circumstances, such as for investigative purposes or in plea negotiations, but their results cannot be presented as evidence during a trial.
Are polygraph results admisable in court martials?
Polygraph results are generally not admissible in court-martial proceedings. The military courts typically follow similar standards to civilian courts regarding the reliability and validity of polygraph tests. While they may be used in investigations or as part of a plea deal, their results cannot be relied upon as definitive evidence in court.
Is poligragh testing admissable in court?
In most states, no. However, in some states they are allowed under certain circumstances. It's typically not within the trial judge's discretion when to and not to admit this evidence. Most states' appellate/supreme courts have set out rules in case law for when polygraph is admissible. For example, in several states, a polygraph is admissible in a criminal case when it is first introduced by the defendant, but the state may not be the first to introduce it. However, if the defendant introduces a polygraph test, the state may rebut that evidence with a conflicting exam.
How many high courts are booked in Mumbai for recording evidence?
how many indian high courts are booked in mumbai for recording evidence
Can you be evicted on hearsay in court?
No, you cannot be evicted solely based on hearsay in court. Hearsay refers to an out-of-court statement offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted, and it is generally not admissible as evidence. Courts require credible evidence, such as documentation or witness testimony, to support eviction proceedings. Landlords must provide concrete proof of lease violations or other valid reasons for eviction.
American courts are usually either federal or courts?
state courts.
IN which courts do cases generally begin when the facts in evidence are heard and decided upon?
Cases generally begin in trial courts, also known as courts of first instance. In these courts, evidence is presented, and facts are heard and decided upon by a judge or jury. Depending on the jurisdiction, trial courts may be referred to as district courts, circuit courts, or superior courts. The decisions made in these courts can often be appealed to higher appellate courts.
What two forms of evidence did new England courts recognize as proof that a person was a witch?
Two forms of evidence that New England courts recognized as proof that a person was a witch were spectral evidence and effluvia.
You are a father requesting a peternity test from the courts but your name is not on the birth certificate what should you do?
File a motion to challenge custody, but if you have contact with the child, you can do it with a simple test bought at a pharmacy. It will not be admissible as evidence, but if it comes back negative, you will not need to go to the extra expense. Only two samples are required. see links below
