Meters can't be converted to kilograms. Meters measure length, while kilograms measure mass.
=
1 kg-m/sec2 is a unit of force, defined as one newton.
From the Steam Tables I get the following: T v sub f d ( kg / m^3 ] 15.0 C 0.001001 m^3/ kg 999.0 kg / m^3 20.0 C 0.001002 m^3/ kg 998.0 kg/ m^3 25.0 C 0.001003 m^3 / kg 1001 kg / L^3 30.0 C 0 .001004 m^3 / kg 996.0 kg/m^3 -------------------- Search also NISTIR 6969, table 9.8 (it's free on Internet) or a density calculator.
No. Mg stands for Miligram and Kg for Kilogram.
1 km. because 1 km= 1000m. so 1000 is more then 999.
145 km is bigger than 145 m.
1 km = 1,000 m That's bigger than 999 m.
The number is 99 trillion 999 billion 999 million 999 thousand 999
1 [N] = 1 [kg] * 1 [m/s2]. Answer: an acceleration of 1 [m/s2].
872 m is longer.
400 kg-m/s 250 kg-m/s
It can work out as: I(M)M which means 1000*1000*1000-1 = 999,999,999 But in all reality the ancient Romans had no real reasons for such large numbers.
Since the units are the same, just compare the numbers.
1 kg*m/s2
if you mean mg, there are 1,000,000mg in kg. A weight is closely related to 3 dimensions of length so you can't associate one length i.e. m, metre to kg
one is the answer.because "kg"is just a shortcut of kilogram.the m is in the complete word "kilogram:
That depends on the sand. Choose one of these densities: Sand, wet - 1920 kg/m³ Sand, wet, packed - 2080 kg/m³ Sand, dry - 1600 kg/m³ Sand, loose - 1440 kg/m³ Sand, rammed - 1680 kg/m³ Sand, water filled - 1920 kg/m³ Now put it into the following formula: kilograms of sand / density = cubic meters of sand
you dont. One is a weight, one a distance