No. It is not.
No. No evidence in the scientific area. Many paranormal occurrences but no scientific evidence.
There is no scientific evidence to support the existence of ghosts, so there is no scientific name for them. Ghosts are often considered to be a paranormal or supernatural phenomenon that is not recognized by the scientific community.
Paranormal refers to phenomena that are beyond scientific explanation or understanding. This can include ghosts, UFOs, psychic abilities, and other experiences that cannot be easily explained by current scientific knowledge.
when the evidence is relatable
It would be interesting to see this "proof" (correct term: evidence). No scientific investigation - and there have been plenty - has ever turned up any such evidence of paranormal phenomena. If and when it found something which was claimed as such, there was a perfectly rational and overly natural explanation. Since there is no such evidence, there is no way paranormal activity fits into the framework of any branch of biology, including evolution.
Mesa County Association for Paranormal Scientific Studies was created in 2005.
Proof Positive Evidence of the Paranormal - 2004 was released on: USA: 6 October 2004
It does not. Paranormal activity is not supported by any evidence I am aware of.
Rosewell, New Mexico as a place is not considered paranormal. The events which purportedly took place there in the 1940s related to UFO activity are considered paranormal.
If something is considered a "superstition", that means it is UNSCIENTIFIC. Once there is evidence that something is true, it will no longer be generally considered a superstition.
To be technical it is supported by no evidence, is internally inconsistent and is not falsifiable.
paranormal definintion:Beyond the range of normal experience or scientific explanation