When someone refers to the past of a verb they are referring to the simple past tense.
Did not do it -> did not do it (same past tense form)
The word "that" is not a verb and does not have a past tense form.
No they are not the same but the past perfect tense uses the past participle.
Yes, past continuous tense is the same as past progressive tense. It is used to indicate an action that was ongoing or in progress in the past. Both terms refer to the same grammatical concept.
"Where" is not a verb nor an action,a nd does not have a past tense form.
it's= it is, it was, it has it's is its own past tense its if you're talking of a pronoun doesn't transform to past tense
It is "cost" (same form as present tense).
Bled is past tense. It's the past tense of bleed.
The past tense of cut is also cut. This makes cut an irregular verb as the past tense doesn't end in -ed.
No it isn't. The past tense of "set" is the same - "set".
The past tense of build is built. The past tense of burst stays the same (burst). The past tense of do is did. The past tense of eat is ate. The past tense of go is went. The past tense of ride is rode. The past tense of ring is rang.
The past tense of "stuck" is "stuck." The word remains the same in both present and past tenses.