Yes
Yes, past continuous tense is the same as past progressive tense. It is used to indicate an action that was ongoing or in progress in the past. Both terms refer to the same grammatical concept.
The continuous tense and the progressive tense are the same thing. To make the continuous future tense you use the following structure: subject + WILL + BE + Verb. For example, I will be running.
Present perfect progressive and present perfect continuous refer to the same tense and are often used interchangeably. Both tenses indicate an action that started in the past and is ongoing or has just been completed. The choice between "progressive" and "continuous" is mainly a matter of dialect or personal preference.
The past continuous of "think" is "was thinking" or "were thinking." For example, "I was thinking about my vacation while driving to work."
No, the present tense and progressive tense are different. The present tense expresses action happening in the current moment (e.g. "I walk to school"), while the progressive tense shows ongoing or continuous action (e.g. "I am walking to school").
Did not do it -> did not do it (same past tense form)
The continuous tense and the progressive tense are the same thing. To make the continuous future tense you use the following structure: subject + WILL + BE + Verb. For example, I will be running.
Present perfect progressive and present perfect continuous refer to the same tense and are often used interchangeably. Both tenses indicate an action that started in the past and is ongoing or has just been completed. The choice between "progressive" and "continuous" is mainly a matter of dialect or personal preference.
The past continuous of "think" is "was thinking" or "were thinking." For example, "I was thinking about my vacation while driving to work."
The sentences, "I might be washing my hair later" and "You will come around, won't you" do not use either of the tenses mentioned in the question. "Might be washing" could be called a "conditional future progressive*" tense, while "will come" and "won't" are both in simple future tense. *"Progressive", which I learned fifty years ago, may mean the same thing as "continuous" when used as part of a name of a tense.
They're the same thing - the 'simple' is usually just missed out.Other forms of the past tense are:Past PerfectPast ContinuousPast Perfect Continuous
No, the present tense and progressive tense are different. The present tense expresses action happening in the current moment (e.g. "I walk to school"), while the progressive tense shows ongoing or continuous action (e.g. "I am walking to school").
Did not do it -> did not do it (same past tense form)
The past tense of "that" is "that." It remains the same in the past tense.
The present tense of "finally" is "finally." This word remains the same in present tense as it is an adverb indicating the conclusion of something or when something is done after a long time.
The same as "present progressive". The tense is formed by combining the appropriate present tense form of "be" to agree with subject with the present participle of the other verb, and it indicates action or state of being continuing from at least the recent past through the present and into at least the immediate future. Example: "He is running fast", when one sees a runner in a race.
No they are not the same but the past perfect tense uses the past participle.
No they are not the same. Future can be formed with will / going to or present continuous (progressive).will + verb -- I will see you tomorrow.be + going to + verb -- I am going to see her tomorrow.be + present participle -- I am seeing her tomorrow.These are the most common ways of talking about the future.Future progressive is:will + be + present participle. This is probably the least common way of talking about the future:I'll be talking to her next week.