Yes, if the jury in a criminal trial can resolve that question then they can deprive the defendant of either their freedom or their life, making it the strongest burden in our court system.
Courts of appeals
reaonable suspicion
Courts can enforce child support orders. But, they cannot "force" a parent to have a relationship with a child(ren). It is reasonable to assume that if a parent has to be "dragged" into a relationship with their children, it would not be a pleasant experience for anyone. Children should know they are loved and wanted as opposed to being a burden.
Legislative
The answer is: In delinquency matters the state must prove its case beyone a reasonable doubt. Prior to In re Winship, a lower standard of evidence had been required by juvenile courts in some states-a mere preponderance of the evidence.
The Judiciary Act of 1891 established nine appellate courts staffed with new judges. The 1891 act retained and even strengthened the circuit courts by providing for the appointment of an additional judge for each circuit court.
The courts are required to say what is right and wrong in a matter. With incidents coming up they can resolve it.
First you must keep in mind that in Federal court as well as most state courts, they must apply the "burden of Proof" this is usually a job performed by the ADA (Assistant District Atorney) If the ADA fails to prove their case "beyond a reasonable doubt, then in theory, the Jury or Judge, must acquit the defendant. In Florida, if you are subject to a parole hearing, parole violation, or any violation of probation, then there is NO BURDEN OF PROOF. All the ADA must prove is a plausible reason or proof that you may have done something, (I know it sucks) the burden of Proof only APPLIES in a JURY TRIAL. Hope this helps !!
In smuggling courts there was no juries just a judge.
The standard of a duty of reasonable care is determined based on what a hypothetical reasonable person would do in similar circumstances, taking into account factors such as the foreseeability of harm, the relationship between the parties, and the nature of the activity involved. Courts consider what actions would be considered reasonable and prudent under the specific circumstances of a case.
The role of the legislature is to make the laws. The legislature has absolutely nothing to do with the application of or the judgment handed out in the courts. At least not in any country that has a reasonable legal system.
Bill of rights interpretation will be required during dispute. In that case interpretation will be by Judiciary branch which is courts. Could be lower courts or Supreme Court