NO No NO sattis are not rajputs .kotli and murree was part of kashmir which was ruled by dogras with 22 small princels states in them .6 of them were ruled by muslims rajputs . kotli and poonch were ruled by mangral rajputs .there is no shajra nasab of sattis there is no name of them in history . in 1931 cences of british india each rajput tribe was described brifely and in rawalpindi too each rajput trbie was mention . sattis them selves didnt mention themselves as rajput and even they dont do it now..sattis are not rajputs .
No, Satti is not a sub-caste of Rajput. Satti refers to a practice prevalent in some regions where a widow would immolate herself on her husband's funeral pyre. Rajput is a social class or caste found primarily in northern India.
Yes sattis are sub caste of rajputs i have seen result of 1932 cencus and i have some.land record paper of 1915
As per my knowledge, "taprial" is not a recognized sub-caste of Rajputs. It is possible that it may be a regional or local community that is not widely known or acknowledged within the broader Rajput community.
not at alll..sodha belongs to very high clan of rajput and are upper caste but these days many no-rajput caste also uses sodha as their surname mostly in rajasthan and they fall in obc catagory...but all origianal rajput sodha are biggest and wealthiest rajput clan of mewar district of rajasthan and sindh as well.......
The Rathod surname is commonly associated with the Rajput community in Rajasthan, not specifically with the Scheduled Caste Koli community. Rajputs are considered an upper caste in the traditional caste system of India.
Both Tomar and Bhadoria are sub-castes within the broader Kshatriya varna in the Indian caste system. There is no hierarchy between them in general, as caste hierarchies can vary across regions and communities.
no vashisht is definitely not a sc ... thay are Brahmins.the surname is after maharishi vashisht who was a a famous sage.
yes
yes
yes
Jup it is a sub-cast for Rana rajpu
No "ACTUALLY PATKAR CASTE IS SUB-CASTE OF PADMASHALE WEAVING CASTE LIKE NESSI, KURNI, MAHAR, MALASALE, ETC.,"
No, Bhutta is not a sub-caste of Rajput. Bhutta is a common surname found among various communities in India, including Rajputs, Jats, and Gujjars, among others. The use of the surname Bhutta does not determine a person's caste or sub-caste.
As per my knowledge, "taprial" is not a recognized sub-caste of Rajputs. It is possible that it may be a regional or local community that is not widely known or acknowledged within the broader Rajput community.
yes,banyal is sub caste of rajputs
yes, origin Guler in Kangra Himachal pradesh.
RAJPUT
originally they were rajput surnames but many gujarat SCs have faked their surnames so you can find person with rathod or solanki surnames but they are schedule caste not original rajputs
Not all Hindus are called Rajputs. Rajput is a sub-caste of Hindu.