No, the first implies that a particular domain is under scientific control, while the second are parameters for an investigation.
English »
AfrikaansAlbanianArabicArmenianAzerbaijaniBasqueBengaliBelarusianBulgarianCatalanChinese (Simp)Chinese (Trad)CroatianCzechDanishDutchEnglishEsperantoEstonianFilipinoFinnishFrenchGalicianGeorgianGermanGreekGujaratiHaitian CreoleHebrewHindiHungarianIcelandicIndonesianIrishItalianJapaneseKannadaKoreanLaoLatinLatvianLithuanianMacedonianMalayMalteseNorwegianPersianPolishPortugueseRomanianRussianSerbianSlovakSlovenianSpanishSwahiliSwedishTamilTeluguThaiTurkishUkrainianUrduVietnameseWelshYiddish
Options : History : Help : Feedback
Text-to-speech function is limited to 100 characters
No
The control is there to compare the difference between it and the experiment. It should not change, but will be affected by the same environmental influences. By checking the control you can rule out environmental influences that may also have affected your experiment.
Same way it controls it now
The control variables.
yes
The scientific method requires reproducibility. I would not think you could skip or rearrange any steps. You need to do the same things in the same order to arrive at the same resolution for the scientific method to be properly applied.
control group will be the same seed, moisture and environment
something in a lab that stays the same
The control in an investigation is something that is not changed in an experiment. Lets say you have and experiment were you are applying sunlight to plants to see how much sunlight affects the plant. The Sunlight will be the VARIABLE (what is changed) and if you are using the same type of plant, The plant would be the CONTROL.
A scientific control is used to minimize the unintended influence of other variables on the same system
In the same sense that everything good is a gift from God, the laws of the universe which we discover through scientific investigation.
CompareValidator Control