Scientific laws are based on scientific experiments, scientific conclusions after exhaustive tests, and they are also based on formerly scientific discoveries and experiments. Scientific evidence without a conclusive proof may be a false evidence. Scientific evidence doesn't exist. Science is not based on evidences, but on real results originated from a theory. Results are solid, palpable, real and cannot be doubted.
Scientific conclusions are based on scientific evidence.
The theory is based on replicable evidence. This evidence turns a theory into a fact.
If it weren't, then it wouldn't be scientific.
A scientific law is based on many repeated correct experiments.
No, a scientific law cannot be demonstrated mathematically as mathematical proofs area form of rationalism (logical based) whereas scientific proofs are a form of empiricism (evidence based), so neither a mathematical law can be proved scientifically nor a scientif law be proved mathematically.
You're playing with words ... a "law" is just a thumb nail description of a theory.
False. A scientific theory and a scientific law are not the same thing. A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of an aspect of the natural world, based on extensive evidence and experimentation, while a scientific law is a statement that describes a consistent and observable phenomenon, often expressed mathematically. Theories can evolve and change with new evidence, whereas laws are generally accepted as universally applicable under specific conditions.
Scientific theories and scientific laws serve different purposes in science. A scientific theory is an explanation of a phenomenon based on extensive evidence and is subject to testing and refinement, such as the theory of evolution. In contrast, a scientific law describes a consistent and universal relationship observed in nature, often expressed mathematically, such as Newton's law of universal gravitation. While theories can evolve with new evidence, laws remain consistent descriptions of observed behaviors.
Ancedotally normally refers to evidence that is based on less scientific evidence but evidence that appears to back up the stronger scientific evidence. It adds weight to scientific evidence but is not necessarily proven.
"The Earth revolves around the sun in an elliptical orbit" is an example of a scientific statement. It is testable, based on evidence and can be verified or falsified through observation and experimentation.
A scientific theory. It helps to explain why certain phenomena occur as they do, based on observation, evidence, and experimentation.
A scientific theory is more likely to be revised or replaced than a scientific law. Theories are based on evidence and can be modified as new evidence or information emerges. Laws, on the other hand, are well-established principles that have withstood extensive testing and are unlikely to change significantly.