I know of no country where self-immolation is legal for any reason. More important than legality is that doing this would deprive the perpetrator of life, or at least life without the suffering and disfigurement that come from burns. Hopefully anyone thinking of self-immolation will be encouraged to seek psychological help from qualified practitioners.
It was indeed a legal protest
yes
Yes, the 1st amendment gives the freedom of speech which includes protest.
Picket, boycott, speech.
A boycott is a voluntary abstention from using or buying goods or services, often as a form of protest. A repeal, on the other hand, is the removal or reversal of a law, rule, or regulation. While a boycott is a form of protest, a repeal is a legal action taken to cancel existing legislation.
A "sit in" is a form of protest.
They have the 1st amendment right to protest on public property, so your answer is yes. Even though they do have the right it seems as if they are not respecting the family of the fallen solider in their protest at the funeral.
A sit-in or sit-down is a form of protest that involves occupying seats or sitting down on the floor of an establishment. It is a non-violent form of protesting.
The Whig Party
People can protest in a dictatorship in the same way that they would protest any other form of government. Typically, a dictatorship has stricter laws prohibiting various types of protest, and therefore protesters would have to violate the law.
The verb form of legal is "legalize."
Yes