Yes, to a very great extent. The trend has been heading in this direction since 1937 and "Social Security".
In specific area's of the government. Socialism is the natural evolution of government
one of them is that workers should control the means of production.
Socialism= big government. With too much government, your rights aren't protected. It's risky to live under socialism because socialist governments believe they're entitled to your work and your property.
Not clear what the question means. But the US is a capitalist society, with a wages system, class ownership and production for sale. Utterly unlike Socialism.
Socialism/Communism imply the abolition of government and the establishment of a classless society where there is a true democracy.
No. While the United States government is espousing policies further to the left of what had been a decade earlier, they are a far cry from Socialism and are often trying to seek capitalism and private ownership with some governmental intervention rather than direct government ownership or management (which would be socialism).
Socialism
Socialism
Socialism
Socialism has a much higher level of government control and regulation than capitalism does.
The US government is not a socialist government. A socialist state is a state that is constitutionally dedicated to constructing a socialist economy, and is utilizing its resources toward that end. Socialism is defined as a system where the means of production are either co-operatively owned or publicly-owned, and the economy is geared toward producing for use rather than for private profit. The US government is not interested in building socialism or transcending capitalism, and would be incapable of doing such a task on its own even if it wanted to.
Socialism