Quite possibly. Nissan's are bad for that. Not good news if you break the timing belt. That is why I tell people the following:
It is better to take a vehicle in and have the timing belt changed at the recommended replacement interval at your convenience as opposed to having to have it TOWED in at your extreme INCONVENIENCE, and at the risk of a much higher repair bill if the valves get bent.
Bent valves require the head(s) to be removed, valves replaced, head checked and trued if warped a bit. Trust me, don't go there, take it in a get the belt replaced and pat yourself on the back for having saved yourself one huge headache.
WRONG. it is NON interference. if the belt breaks, the motor will stop, but nothing hits. just put another belt on, line it up, and go. i would change out all the associated parts, tensioner, pulleys, water pump, etc. both engines in the millenia are NOT prone to breaking belts. i have seen engines with near 200k, and the belt looks new. i sure ain't changing ours until 200k or more.
The millenia P - has 2.5 liter engine, The Millenia S has a 2.3 liter engine
No , it is not an interference engine
i think you mean interference. it is NON interference. if the timing belt breaks, the valves dont hit the pistons
2001 Mazda millenia
i have a 2001 mazda 626 v-6 2.5 engine my timing belt broke i had the belt and tesioner pulley replaced and its running fine
NO, the Mazda B4000 is basically a re-badged Ford Ranger. The 4.0 L engine has a timing chain and not a belt.
i have the same problem with my Mazda millenia 2001
The 2001 Chrysler 3.5 engine is an interference engine.
Follow the wires from the spark plugs and they will go to the distributor unless the engine does not have one and has a coil pack.
in da tank
Premium only
No, you are better off with a Honda.