No. The Continental army that fought the British was organized under a confederacy of colonies (later becoming states under the Articles of Confederation). The Union army wasn't born until the US constitution was ratified in 1787.
NO
Yes
They were both army's, they had the same fighting tactics, and they both fired the Brown Bess Muskett
Yes it was, the Red Army was the official army of the entire Soviet Union. Ukraine, was part of the Soviet Union was the Ukrainian SSR, so Ukraine's army was the Red Army. Same with Belarus (Belorussian SSR), Lithuania (Lithuanian SSR) and all those former Soviet states.
The Union army's goal was to capture Richmond, which was the Confederate's capital. The same goes for the Confederacy. They wanted to capture Washington DC, the Union's capital.
The collective noun army is used for:an army of antsan army of caterpillarsan army of frogsan army of herringan army of soldiers
The British army and the Turkish army has the same strength
No, the army does not embrace different cultures, it is about only one culture. Every soldier in the army is expected and required to do the same things in the same way as every other soldier in the army; to wear the same haircut and the same uniform, to eat the same food, and to follow the same orders. Anyone who is not prepared to do that does not belong in the army.
The same as white soldiers, to shoot and be shot at.
They didn't. They are the same thing.
Military has different branches like Army and Navy and the Army is one branch of the military.
PROS About Continental army:*When they were at war they lived close to America, So shipping was faster.*They had a lot of hope. Like the Movie 300, against Millions.Cons:*They're Rifles were all different so it was difficult to support Ammunition to them.*Lack of health, And knowledge of battle, led many to death in the Continental Army.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Pros About British Army:*They were more sophisticated and they had the latest Guns supported from King George The III, Processed by -----The British Congress/Constitution.*They were very well trained to fight in war.Cons:*Since they were at America fighting the war, and they lived all the way back at Britain, it took very long to ship the the ammunition, food, etc...*They thought that they weren't gonna lose to some lousy Americans Calling themselves "soldiers". So they thought they would win and didn't give much of a "crap", as some people state it these days.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------If that answers your question, I would be glad to answer more. And. that is most likely why Americans won the Revolutionary war. At first you yourself would think 50,000 British soldiers, against 17,000 unprepared Americans. -------Kevin =P