Yes; the scanning of protected materials constitutes unlicensed duplication.
Google's caching of content was found not to be infringing in two cases: Field v Google and Parker v Google. Google's defenses were fair use, implied license, estoppel, and DMCA safe harbor protection.
As of July 2008, Google's YouTube is being sued by: Italian Mediaset for 500 million euros French TF1 for 100 million euros US Viacom Inc. for 1 billion US dollars
Yes you can be, at the very least, "shut down". Unlike copyright, trademarks MUST be defended by the mark holder or they can be lost via "dilution".
Google gives the copyright date as the current year, because that's the date the page rendered.
'Enter' translates to Africaans as 'Voer' - according to Google translate.
North African. That is one of the main one according to google
No. In fact, the opposite is true. Most of the images you will find on Google® ARE protected by copyright which belongs to their respective owners.
Web pages are typically designed to indicate a new copyright date each time they are generated; thus the copyright date would be the current year. That being said, the site went live in 1998.
Google has the copyright to create the Chrome. The developers of Chrome worked in Google to develop the browsers.
Google Books
US Copyright Office is an office of public record for copyright registration and deposit of copyrightmaterial. Google it,,,,