Patterson's film is a fake. I had it,but I gave it to my nephew to get his juices flowing-no results. It's all over YouTube.
White tennis shoes in the first 15 seconds of the film are conclusive enough.
The woman in the suit made a deathbed confession,it is a fake. She was pretty afraid,so she didn't say anything. It brought in the customers.
Photographer said it is a fake just prior to his death. They had taken a blood oath with each other to not say,it's a fake. I think Patterson died,and said it is a fake just before,he died too.
Most people don't see the rest of the film which made it more believable. He tracked it to the Arctic Circle,sat three weeks,during the spring thaw and a baby bigfoot appeared with its mother. He claimed bigfoot is migratory. Since I first read the story in the SF Chronical 50 years ago,this is the best evidence. Noooo. So I'm going to tell the truth and run. Have a nice day.
I'm sorry to tell you but the answer is yes here's why, well the famous Patterson gimlin film was shot by roger Patterson with his friend bob gimlin in the 1900's. Roger who captured the so called female Sasquatch that he called "patty" on camera. But I found that at that time roger was running out of money. Some time after Rogers's death a man named Bob Heironimus claimed he was the Bigfoot in the patterson gimlin film so they took Bob into an office with a lie detector and asked him some important questions including the question wee you the Bigfoot in the Patterson footage? Bob answered yes. When the test was done the girl who had put him to the test printed out the answer sheet to if he was TELLING THE TRUTH or LYING the sheet said Bob was telling none other than the TRUTH. And another man who claimed he mad the suit that Bob was in, claimed that he made he suit out of horse hide. Sp yes the Patterson film is a hoax, sorry:(
yes
1972
the patterspon/gimlin has never proven to be a hoax. the guy in the suit has never came forward and the suit has not been collected. Natives have related stories about the sasquatch for centuries ago.
just another hoax
Some films are not a hoax, like that Patterson-Gimlin Film one where the body moves a way a human cannot, and plus the mouth moves. Bigfoot may or may not be a hoax, each person needs to decide for themselves. It's also important to remember that some people have a need to believe in things unexplained and unprovable or conspiracies. If you prefer to believe and someone is trying to convince you that Bigfoot is a hoax, that would be their opinion you still have a right to your own. Unless you asked them, as you did here, it's really none of their business. If you really want an upfront answer, it's my personal opinion that Bigfoot is a myth. Photos, videos, and heresay are not proof; even in a court proceeding, such evidence requires something additional to support it. Until there is some concrete proof, I'll remain in the maybe but not likely group.
The Patterson film was made in 1967. Many believe it is really a Bigfoot, not a man in a suit. You can see muscles moving under the skin, and it appears to have breasts, as if it were female. It is unlikely a hoaxster would have paid so much attention to detail.
No, he really passed away.
The sole purported video of Bigfoot is the Patterson-Gimlin film shot in October 1967 and is available on YouTube. In 2002 Morris Costumes put forth a purported Bigfoot video which was later admitted to be a hoax to promote the company.
No, he's really dead.
No. Its a hoax.
GPS co-ordinate readings for the Patterson-Gimlin Film site: N. 41*26.301 W. 123*42.357 Elevation: 2560' -72'
Are there some brief footage of bigfoot that are too short tell is it is hoax or real. The best bigfoot footage was done in 1967 by Patterson and Gimlin.
This film hasn't been created. This film was just a hoax, who came up with fans of Open Season (this is fan fiction film and it's not real).