Fully capable. The Royal Navy has been fighting wars for centuries, and winning many of them. The Royal Navy up until world war two was the largest navy in the world and is currently the third largest behind Russia and America. Given the size difference between the three one could argue that for it's size the Royal Navy is the best around and is just as if not more technologically advanced to Russia and the USA!
The German Navy had to resort to "Guerre de Course" warfare; commerce raiding, submarines sinking merchant vessels. If the German Navy had strong battle fleets, then they would've fought a "Guerre de Escadre" type of naval war; FLEET ENGAGEMENTS. Therefore, no, the Royal Navy was more powerful. Only the US, UK, and Japanese Navies were capable of traditional surface warfare. Addition: Up until WWII it had been the policy of successive British governments to make the Royal Navy larger than than the next TWO largest navies in the world added together. Because so much of Britain's trade depended on control of the sea the Royal Navy was intended to be capable of fighting two major opponents at the same time.
Yes Pakistanis and Indians were in World War 2 fighting in the Royal Army and Royal Navy. In those days Pakistan was part of India. We have located a web site which will educate you about the Pakistani/Indian part in the war.
The U.S. Navy, Royal Navy, U.S.S.R Navy.
The British Royal Navy.
In 1940, William Golding was serving in the Royal Navy during World War II. He was an officer in the Royal Navy and participated in various campaigns in the war.
The Royal Australian Navy had the Fifth largest navy in the world at the begginning of World War 2.
Yes, they are capable, and have already done so in every war ever fought.
The Royal Navy had many bases, but Scapa Flow was the main home base.
War and Military History
The British: The Royal Navy.
Japan
The motto of Royal Navy is 'If you wish for peace, prepare for war'.