Having an adversarial system of justice is the most accepted system, fairness is subjective.æ However, having a set of jurours decide versus just a judge seems more fair.
Is our justice system set up to give suspected Criminals a fair trial
They call it fair but the legal system has been corrupted to the point were you can get probation for hesitating to plea.
He used such adversary in his group.
In public trial, yes. In federal trial, no. -ThunderF00T (Watch my Youtube videos including scientific enclosements.) :)
right to a fair trial presumption of innocence
A fair trial before an impartial jury of their peers.
A "fair trial" is a neutral trial conducted to accord each party to the proceeding their due process rights.The right to a fair trial applies to civil and criminal proceedings and various rights associated with a fair trial are explicitly proclaimed in the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution.In a fair trial, the accused's legal rights are safeguarded and respected.A fair trial hears before it condemns (i.e.: The trial proceeds on inquiry and renders judgment only aftertrial).In a fair trial, jurors are to be entirely indifferent as to the parties at the outset.The necessary elements of a fair trial are an adequate hearing and an impartial tribunal, free from any interest, bias, or prejudice.A fair trial presupposes full justice is rendered within human limitations.
C. A Fair Trial
The judge has a passive role in the adversary system and an active one in the inquisitorial. The counsel has an active role in the adversary and a passive role in the inquisitorial. In adversary, the burden of proof rests on the accuser whereas in the inquisitorial the burden of proof rests on noone. Adversary systems can have juries.
A fair trial where justice is served.
The judge has a passive role in the adversary system and an active one in the inquisitorial. The counsel has an active role in the adversary and a passive role in the inquisitorial. In adversary, the burden of proof rests on the accuser whereas in the inquisitorial the burden of proof rests on noone. Adversary systems can have juries.
The judge has a passive role in the adversary system and an active one in the inquisitorial. The counsel has an active role in the adversary and a passive role in the inquisitorial. In adversary, the burden of proof rests on the accuser whereas in the inquisitorial the burden of proof rests on noone. Adversary systems can have juries.