Nobody know when the end of the world will be. Both science and superstition have there viewpoints, but neither are significantly substantial.
Science didn't evolve from superstition. It came from curiosity about the world.
Science and superstition are both ways that mankind tries to explain the world, his place in it, and how to exert control over it. Other than that, there are no similarities.
There was a period of history in which science was not known to the human race. Instead of science, mythology and superstition were the basis of human understanding of the world.
+
Math is really the language of science.
NO IT WILL NOT HAPPEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! It is a superstition that the world will end in 2012 but it isn't true!
If it can be explained then it is not a superstition.
There is none. Superstition is completely bereft of science. However, a savvy person may use scientific techniques to gain advantage over someone who believes in superstitions.
The Enlightenment was called the Age of Reason because it emphasized the importance of using logic, reason, and empirical evidence to understand the world and solve problems. It marked a shift away from superstition, tradition, and religious authority in favor of rational thinking and scientific inquiry.
Science was created by eliminating mythology, superstition, and philosophy from explanations and understanding of the natural world. One of the world's first scientists was Al Biruni from Persia, in the 11th century. He predated Galileo five hundred years.
whats in is that the world did not end
Albert Tshibangu-Wa-Mulumba has written: 'Science et superstition chez Auguste Comte' -- subject(s): Philosophy, Science, Superstition