Science relies on repeatable, redundant results from experiments in order to consider it valid.
Science didn't evolve from superstition. It came from curiosity about the world.
+
Nobody know when the end of the world will be. Both science and superstition have there viewpoints, but neither are significantly substantial.
Math is really the language of science.
Science and superstition are both ways that mankind tries to explain the world, his place in it, and how to exert control over it. Other than that, there are no similarities.
Yes, It is the problem of all.
If it can be explained then it is not a superstition.
There is none. Superstition is completely bereft of science. However, a savvy person may use scientific techniques to gain advantage over someone who believes in superstitions.
Science has a problem with answering it, because people just started to become scared of it. There is no exactreason why. Some people don't like scary stuff, so they just don't like that day. Many bad things have occured on that day too.
Albert Tshibangu-Wa-Mulumba has written: 'Science et superstition chez Auguste Comte' -- subject(s): Philosophy, Science, Superstition
Superstition is the belief of the supernatural, the unexplained, and the unimaginable. And for the most part, cannot be proved. Science on the other hand, is the study of just about everything and anything. Science is anything or everything that can be proved in a variety of studies. There are many branches of scicence.. such as Technology ( -ology [The study of] ). Geology, Biology, and many other branches of science. To be brief.. Superstition is anything underlying a faith of the unprovable. Science is the study of anything, that can be proved.
This effect is best categorized as interference.+