Want this question answered?
Negligence
Nonfeasance
What helps determine that the voucher has supporting obligation documentations prior to certification
What helps determine that the voucher has supporting obligation documentations prior to certification
It pretty much means as it says. Reasonable is defined as what the average person of the general public would deem prudent and commonly acceptable under a given circumstances.
Due care refers to the effort made by an ordinarily prudent or reasonable party to avoid harm to another, taking the circumstances into account. It refers to the level of judgment, care, prudence, determination, and activity that a person would reasonably be expected to do under particular circumstances.
Excusable Neglect (CCP473(b)): To be excusable, the neglect must have been the act or omission of a reasonably prudent person under the circumstances. Forgetting the lawsuit, being too busy to properly respond, or being unable to afford an attorney are not ground for excusable neglect. Examples of excusable neglect include: * Illnes that disables the party from responding on apearing in court * Failure to respond because you relied on your attorney to do so * Failure to appear at trial because you relied on misinformation provided by a court officer.
Generally speaking, the duty of care owed to others is to behave as "a reasonably prudent person." For example, you might be held liable for hitting a pedestrian with your car while texting, even if texting while driving is not illegal in your state. The jury or judge would have to find that a reasonably prudent person would not drive and text at the same time.
Adjective, Definition: prudent: taking into consideration all possible circumstances and consequences before acting.
The answer depends upon who is legally liable for causing the collision. Legal liability can arise from violation of a statute or ordinance, or from simple negligence. Negligence is basically the failure to exercise that degree of care that a reasonably prudent person would have used under the same or similar circumstances. In some states the doctrine of comparative negligence is used. This means that it is possible for each party to be found to be partially at fault. In such a case, damages are reduced by the degree to which a person is found to be negligent.
negligenceAdded: Or a violation of a contract.
prudent is the root