No. These are distinctly different diseases.
Most probably answer to your question would include next: Colonized by MRSA means that particular person has this germ in or on a body site,but has no clinical symptoms of MRSA. It is possible that same person is a temporary or longer term carrier of this type of disease.
MRSA is a form of staph. Staph is bacterial
mrsa is the most unknown and deadly disease
MRSA
MRSA is not a disease, it stands for "Methicilin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus", so it's a strain of S.aureus.
While the disease caused by MRSA may have been cured, it doesn't mean that the person doesn't carry any MRSA germs on his or her body. Many, many people are colonized with MRSA -- it lives on them without causing disease. "Cure" in the case of a MRSA-related rash or boil means that the skin problem is cured, but not that all MRSA has been eliminated from the person. A related question: how do you know that you're not colonized with MRSA yourself?
If you have any form of contagious and/or infectious disease, you cannot donate blood until you have absolutely no trace of the disease in your system.
fifth disease doesn't have swollen cheeks
Ultrasound is used to diagnose fetal fifth disease.
No they do not.
The best treatment for MRSA would be to bring her to the hospital. It is a disease that can easy spread so anti-biotics would be needed from a doctor.