I have a 8gb Sony NWZA818
I'll tell you a few things about them and then let you decide
MP3 Players will usually only play music but will occasionally pick up some additional extras. My MP3 player has an extremelly good battery life of 30 hours and is very compact.
One of the biggest pro's for MP3 players is that they are nearly limitless as to where they can get their music from. As long as you have windows, you will be able to put music on. Whereas an iPod is limited to just iTunes
iPods are great if you want an mp3 player that does more such as play movies, and (if you get one of the best ones) have MASSIVE music storage space.
In my opinion, mp3 players are better because they tend to have better battery life and are easy to use
An iPod is an MP3 player. Is that true?
An mp3 player is better by along shot. First of all, mp3 players are cheaper than ipods. Second, you have to pay one dollar a song on an ipod. A mp3 player's songs are all free.
Of course. The iPod touch has more features than the 4GB video MP3 player.
iPod
The ipod itself is an mp3 player. Ipod is just a specific brand name produced by Apple. Most ipods have more features than a generic mp3 player: http://www.webopedia.com/DidYouKnow/Hardware_Software/2008/iPod_mp3Player.asp
Yes. The iPod touch is better than the 4GB video MP3 player so yes the iPod touch could win.
A mp3 player way better
An ipod is a very popular and high quality mp3 player. While mp3 players may be less expansive, you might not get the to notch quality of an ipod.
iPod and mp4 have the same quality. mp4s are better than mp3s. iPod and Mp4
Depending upon personal preference a Coby MP3 player might be more attractive than an iPod Nano. They both share many of the same features but the Coby MP3 player is significantly cheaper and uses Windows Media.
They are the same things but I have an iPod Touch and an mp3 player but I use the iPod much more because you can have APPS on it :)
I would suggest the ipod nano because it is less complicated than the other mp3s