A Vision is defined as, "An Image of the future we seek to create." A Mission is defined as, "Purpose, reason for being." Defined simply "Who we are and what we do".
RAINN stands for "The Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network". It is a non-profit organization focused on prevention of sexual assault against anyone of any age, either sex. You can read RAINN's Mission Statement here: http://www.rainn.org/about-rainn/mission-statement
A Mission statement is a simple, easy to read piece of condensed information that tells the client a clear and concise representation of the corporation's purpose for existence. It focuses on the company's current status, defines the corporation's targeted customer and identifies the critical processes required for interested applicants, as well as informing the client of the desired level of performance expected.A Vision Statement is the motivation and framework of a corporation's strategic planning and unlike the mission statement it focuses on the company's future rather than the here and now. The purpose of a vision statement is to remind the owner, partners, employees, and investors what they are trying to achieve and it can be applied to either the entire corporation or even just a single division within. It compiles all of the company's hopes, dreams and future goals, concentrates on what exactly the organization wants to be and provides very clear decision-making criteria on how to reach that objective.
The mission statement is a recent device to attempt to sum up the aims and values of a company in a single sentence. It is generally doomed to fail since it is either trite or vacuous to attempt such a thing. Actions speak volumes, words ultimately dissapoint.
A Vision Statement is the motivation and framework of a corporation's strategic planning and unlike the mission statement it focuses on the company's future rather than the here and now. The purpose of a vision statement is to remind the owner, partners, employees, and investors what they are trying to achieve and it can be applied to either the entire corporation or even just a single division within. It compiles all of the company's hopes, dreams and future goals, concentrates on what exactly the organization wants to be and provides very clear decision-making criteria on how to reach that objective.
She won't. Telling her will probably not convince her either.
It's a paradox, if you answer anyway is wrong.If he's telling the truth them he would be lying, if he was lying then he would be telling the truth.He's lyingThere's no paradox. Just because it's not true that he always lies does not mean that he never lies. He lies sometimes, just like everyone else.Now, if he said 'This sentence is a lie', that would be a paradox.Indeed there is no paradox. The definition of a paradox implies that something is both true and false. There is a big mistake in the quite commonly accepted explanation from above: "if he was lying then he would be telling the truth". If someone lies, then he's NOT telling the truth, because he's lying. If he's lying when making this statement, the definition of lying implies that the statement itself is a lie, meaning in this case that he's not always lying. If he's telling the truth when saying he always lies, then that statement is also a lie, because he isn't always lying, he just told the truth. Actually, it doesn't matter if he's lying or telling the truth because either way this statement is a lie so it can never be true. Hence it's not a paradox.(For the statement to be true it can never be spoken out loud. Because when you tell someone you always lie, either you have to tell the truth about that which makes your statement false again or you lie about always lying, which again makes this statement a lie)ParadoxIf a man says, "I always lie", then the moment before he said it, it could have been either true or false that he always lies. If the man had ever told the truth, at any time in his life prior to making this statement, then the statement is simply false, and he is lying.But consider what happens if the statement was true prior to him saying so. If every word ever spoken by this man, prior to making that statement, was a lie, then it would have been accurate for someone else to say, about him, "he always lies". However, the moment he said it himself, he has told the truth, for once in his life, So, at first analysis, the statement is true.However, if the statement is true, then his "perfect record" of lying is no longer intact, i.e., it is no longer true that he "always lies", making the statement false the moment it is uttered.So far, that is in agreement with those who claim there is no paradox. However, those claims fail to carry this scenario all the way out. You see, if the statement is false, as we have just established, then the man's "perfect record" of lying is now intact once again. And it is true that he "always lies", making the statement true.But if the statement is true, then it is no longer true that he always lies, and therefore the statement is false. But if the statement is false then it is again true that he always lies, and so the statement is true.And on and on and on. That is why this is a paradox (if the statement was true before he said it). If it is true, it is false; and if it is false, it is true. Simply being true makes it false. Simply being false makes it true. So it is true and false at the same time. I think someone said that was the very definition of a paradox.So to summarize, if the man had ever told the truth prior to making this statement, then this statement is simply false. However, if he had never told the truth prior to making this statement, then the statement is, in fact, a paradox.
i don't know either
"Not me either", or "me neither" are correct. Simply "me either" is not correct.
Not sure exactly what you are asking but if you are implying his response to the girl telling him that she loved him was "I don't have a girlfriend;" although a true statement, he is either reserving his own feelings or simply is leaving the opportunity to be with her.
conditin are given in for statement they check one time either it true or false and in while statement they check again and again untell the condition false.
CNS
He cannot say "I am lying." (if he always tells the truth, he's lying - if he's always lying, he's telling the truth). This is known as the Liar's Paradox.