It entirely depends upon your point of view, it's not possible to say that one system is better than another.
Advocates of the 'opt-in' system say that it gives people and their relatives the right to dignity and control over their own bodies (even though they're dead anyway), and also removes the risk of organs being removed by mistake when a patient is THOUGHT to be dead but is in fact yet alive (meaning that they WOULD have recovered, but the organ removal killed them anyway). Those who support the 'opt-out' system say that it would hugely increase the number of donor organs available for transplant and save hundreds of lives per year, whilst at the same time giving the individual the right to say 'no' if they don't want their organs removed after they have died.
Both sides have valid arguments, but in most countries, the 'opt-in' method is preferred. In Europe, only Portugal has the 'opt-out' system, although it is scheduled to be introduced in Wales as well before long.
marking system is better than grading system because for intell students
Opt
As we have to go with high security and no wastage of time at employees work place it is better and best to opt UNIX or its flavors as the operating system
Countries that use an opt-out system for organ donation include Spain, Belgium, Austria, and Argentina. In these countries, individuals are presumed to consent to organ donation unless they specifically choose to opt out.
How much better than what?
no
no
I would go with architecture.
I don't know for sure, but I don't suggest you try it. Better be safe than sorry. For a treat, opt for some apples or a carrot :)
better job prospects
better!
no