Typically no because a Roman Numeral System is one System and a Decimal System is another.
EX:
Decimal- 0.4
Romal- VII
Decimal.
1. Roman numeral system does not follow the place value system like decimal system. 2. the numerals if written at left or right of a bigger numeral get subtracted or added, but in decimal system this type of confusion is not there. rks_21269@yahoo.com
Twenty-one in decimal notation is 21. In Roman numeral notation it is XXI.
No, the Roman numeral system is not a place value system. In the Roman numeral system, each individual symbol represents a specific value, and there is no concept of place value. Place value systems, such as the decimal system, rely on the position of digits within a number to determine their value.
The Roman numeral MMCCCLX represents the number 2360 in decimal form.
Decimal.
The Roman numeral system is decimal but not directly positional and does not include a zero.
1. Roman numeral system does not follow the place value system like decimal system. 2. the numerals if written at left or right of a bigger numeral get subtracted or added, but in decimal system this type of confusion is not there. rks_21269@yahoo.com
Twenty-one in decimal notation is 21. In Roman numeral notation it is XXI.
No, the Roman numeral system is not a place value system. In the Roman numeral system, each individual symbol represents a specific value, and there is no concept of place value. Place value systems, such as the decimal system, rely on the position of digits within a number to determine their value.
There is no Roman numeral for 3485000. The largest decimal number that can be represented with Roman numerals is 4999
The Roman numeral system does not use the letter A.
The Roman numeral MMCCCLX represents the number 2360 in decimal form.
Dewey decimal system
Yes the Roman numeral system evolved from the Etruscan numeral system and the Etruscans once ruled the Romans.
There is no equivalent Roman numerals because the Romans didn't have a decimal place system although they used fractions to a limited extent
The Roman Numeral system did not have a way to represent zero.