This phrasing is not flagrantly wrong, but not perfectly correct, either. You don't normally nurture someone into something, nurturing is not really transitive. You might instead say something like, "your nurturing helped me to succeed".
No, the correct sentence would be "Who is the singing woman?" by adding a question mark at the end. It is asking for the identity of a woman who is singing.
It is what you will hear in informal speech, but is not correct for formal writing. Try: "That is the girl.", "That is the woman.", "That is my sister.", "That is my wife.", etc. The grammatically correct form of the sentence 'That is her' is 'That is she.'
Yes, if the sentence is supposed to be in present tense.
It would be: "Does the way a woman dresses contribute to violence?"
"Women are" would be used in a sentence describing multiple females. "Woman is" is incorrect.
No, that sentence should read there was a man and a woman in the car. If you were to say there were two people in the car, then the verb is plural for a plural subject, two people. But this way, the subject is a man, which is singular. The woman is also singular. The implied grammar is this: there was a man in the car and there was also a woman in the car. Singular in both cases.
The sentence you propose is a correct use of notwithstanding.Lady Macbeth, notwithstanding her role as a woman, was a powerful character.The word notwithstanding presents an opposition or primary difference to your main comment. It would be the same as writing:Even though Lady Macbeth was a woman, she was a powerful character.The word "notwithstanding" eliminates some wordiness when used correctly.
woman's is the possessive form of woman. The woman's car was stolen.
the woman went shopping
The woman answered a question.
Groucho Marx"Behind every successful man is a woman, behind her is his wife."
The woman next door works everyday