No it justs refracts further
Not necessarily, but the frequencies are different.
No, it is lower.
Indigo has a higher frequency..
No, "infra" means below, "ultra" means above. Infra red light is below red and ultra violet is above violet light.
Ultraviolet radiation is of higher energy than visible light. Ultra-violet suggests that it is above violet in the spectrum, and the colour violet is the uppermost region of visible light.
Ultraviolet light has a shorter wavelength than visible light.
Violet light has a higher frequency than red light by roughly a factor of 2.
The violet light has more energy than the red light. Red light is lower on the electromagnetic spectrum, meaning it has a lower frequency (or longer wavelength). You'll recall the colors of the rainbow as red, orange, yellow, etc., and these are the colors going up the frequency spectrum. Photons higher on the spectrum are higher in frequency and energy.
It isn't. The velocity of both is the same at about 2.998x108m/s. A change in wavelength is associated with a change in frequency not velocity. The frequency of Ultraviolet light is about 750 PHz (Peta Hertz) while that of infrared half that at 375PHz.
EM radiation higher in frequency than violet visible light but lower in frequency than soft x-rays.
-- Red light has the lowest frequency of those three. -- Green light has lower frequency than violet light has. -- The wavelength of all light is inversely proportional to its frequency.
Red light has lower energy photons than blue light. Ultra-violet is even more energetic.