Want this question answered?
No. There is no legal requirement for animal testing.
By law, only their butts are used for animal testing. No joke.klick
I am afraid that animal cosmetic testing isn't banned in Canada yet. They are allowed to use animals in medical testing and cosmetic testing, under strict laws that the cosmetics are under a certain policy.
The reason we should get rid of animal testing is because it is torture to the animals and animals dont have the same reactions to things like humans do. they react a whole lot differently. So please stop animal testing & animal cruelty!
According to PETA.com Vichy does use animal testing for some of its products. And it is good to keep in mind that Vichy is owned by L'Oréal Paris, one of the biggest animal testing companies on the planet.
In the US animal testing is regulated by the 1966 Animal Welfare Act (AWA). At this time AWA only covers mammals. Another regulatory instrument is the Health Research Extension Act of 1985 enforced by the Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare (OLAW).
no it is not as bad then animal testing
SUPER EXPTREMLY EXPENSIVE animal testing is the cheapest and most efficiant way
Proctor and Gamble, the makers of Head and Shoulders, say that 99 percent of their safety evaluations are done without animal testing. The final percent is performed on animals because the law requires it or when there are no other alternatives.
The Aveda website says that "Aveda does not conduct animal testing on its products or ask others to do so on our behalf except if required by law, and actively supports the development of alternative methods to animal testing)."
Yes, animal testing is around the whole world !
well if the testing is from animal haters the animal will die but if they are good it will live......