None. Legends were used to explain things to man and how they worked. This comes from a time before science and yet man still had questions. He made up legends to give reasons for what happened to him and around him.
In legends, sure! But there is no proof of it actually happening in real life.
Some examples of urban legends would be big foot or a yeti. Loch Ness monster, chuppacobre, things told as if they were real but there is no proof.
no but there is no proof that they aren't
Some examples of urban legends would be big foot or a yeti. Loch Ness monster, chuppacobre, things told as if they were real but there is no proof.
yes because vampires are not real
no
Not by that name.
yes
There are many legends, all differing from each other. Though there is no real proof King Arthur ever even lived, some believe Sir Lancelot or one of the other knights of The Round Table took over. Other legends, and there is some historical proof, that the Anglo-Saxons took over Britain. However, there is no proof whether or not there was any King between the legendary, King Arthur, and the Saxons.
myths and legends are not real but barts of it are
There has never been any proof because Vampires are make-believe.
No, that is why they are called legends.