yes because gas gives out more energy
Because theres more liquid.
Using lights less uses less electricity. Most of the electricity that powers lights comes from power plants that burn fossil fuels. The burning of fossil fuels is the largest contributor to air pollution.
Less then you "burn" Less then you "burn"
Less traffic and less pollution.
Alcohols burn with less pollution than petrol primarily due to their chemical structure, which allows for more complete combustion and produces fewer harmful byproducts. They typically have a higher oxygen content, leading to more efficient oxidation of the fuel during combustion. This results in lower emissions of carbon monoxide, unburned hydrocarbons, and particulate matter. Additionally, the combustion of alcohols tends to produce less carbon dioxide per unit of energy produced compared to petrol.
Less factory work, taking the subway instead of a car, carpooling, reduce waste, and planting some trees or leafy shrubs.
Recycling is helpful for the environment because we are reusing products instead of throwing them in landfill. This means that there will be less landfill to burn, meaning less toxic gases being released into the air.
Actually air pollution has been less of a problem than ever. The people who suffer worst from air pollution are people who burn biomass (wood, food waste, dung) inside without proper ventilation. In cities outdoor air pollution was a problem which was made worse by industrialization. In London smog was common and deadly smogs happened every decade or so. Air pollution in most US cities peaked in the 1950's and is far less of a problem than when the first Earth Day was held in 1971.
yes i does cause less pollution but it can't run cars
It has less because you add a solid and liquid together and you get less.
cars make pollution, so by driving less decreases the amount of pollution(gas in the air).
cars make pollution, so by driving less decreases the amount of pollution(gas in the air).