Yes. That is 100% true. Microsoft and Linux will engage in an outright war on your computer. Basically, trying to simplify the term softwar, they both have distructive viruses in their code. Unfortunately for Microsoft, Linux has the better defence system and a better virus.
The open source movement remains a font of innovation to this day, and not just in the commercial sector. Numerous projects founded by universities, loosely knit communities, and individuals are exploring areas yet to be taken on by mainstream, proprietary software products. Here are just seven examples of exciting new ideas in software that you may be able to buy from proprietary vendors someday, but that you can only get for free from the open source community today. Proprietary software vendors, including Microsoft, would have you believe the open source movement has produced nothing but knockoffs of existing products and cast-off code that couldn't cut it in the free market. But while many open source projects, such as OpenOffice.org, do in fact represent well-established categories, to claim that open source has contributed nothing new to the software landscape is a gross exaggeration. For starters, much of the software in use on the Web today -- from the Firefox and Chrome browsers to the Apache Web Server to scripting languages such as Perl, Python, and Ruby -- began life as open source projects.
I prefer open source software.
commercial software is made for profit. it is maintained by a company, and it's code is a trade secret, hidden, "closed source", because you can't see it (and therefore steal it) open source software is free to use. it is created not for profit, typically maintained by a community of individuals. its code is free for everyone to look at, modify, steal, etc. sometimes you will have trouble downloading open source software - make sure you download the "windows binaries" or "windows compile" and not the source code
Open source refers to code that is distributed outside of the manufacturer's company. Microsoft does not allow the code the programmers write for their programs outside of their company, so their code is proprietary, closed source. OpenOffice allows their code to be used by others. The reason for this is so that others can make improvements and customized enhancements. Open source is almost always free, where proprietary software has to be paid for, and is sometimes quite expensive.
An open source application software is a software application which also provides the users the opportunity to take the source code and edit it. Customizing the source code and sharing it to other users for free is a way to make sure that the software is meant to benefit the user and not the programmer.
No, most closed-source software is not free. For example, Microsoft Windows and Microsoft Office are closed-source and not free.
No, most closed-source software is not free. For example, Microsoft Windows and Microsoft Office are closed-source and not free.
no....because an open source software is distributed for free
No.
Yes it is. It is owned by Microsoft and they do not give access to the source code for the program, unlike open source software programs.
I would say that Microsoft Project but other products are increasing too, especially free and open source products.
Microsoft Windows
microsoft windows
Open source software is designed to do exactly what its closed source (paid software) counterpart is to do. Open Office for example is free to use and does the same thing as Microsoft office that costs hundreds.
Money is the main driver, control the next.
There is no safe online source for torrents of Microsoft Office seeing that Microsoft Office is not freeware. If you wish to use the software you are going to have to buy the program.
you actually cant.its not an open source software..its closed unlike Microsoft and Linux.