yes war is the only answer for peace if we didn't have war we would all live in a depressed world and we could never travel because the leaders would act like school children and would not talk to each other and no 1 would be happy
Only for those that die in them.
The phrase "it doesn't have to be peace and war" suggests that there are alternatives to extreme positions or opposite ends of a spectrum. It implies that there can be other options or solutions that do not fall within those two extremes.
It depends on your definition of 'peace'. In ancient Rome, Pax Romana (the Roman peace) was achieved by waging war and subjugating all other cultures to their rule. Sure, peace is better than war, but you only have peace when you have killed everyone who doesn't think you should rule the world.
Peace
Peace. War and Peace is a book.
Depends on your definition of "War", but actually, more countries are at peace than at war today (by far).
Justice, peace, and war are concepts related to societal order and conflict resolution. Justice seeks to uphold fairness and equality in society, while peace aims to maintain harmony and stability. War, on the other hand, represents a breakdown of peace and justice, often arising from conflicts and disputes that cannot be resolved through peaceful means.
When there is war, there is fighting. People are at odds with each other over one thing or another. When there is not war, there is peace. The word used for when there is no war is peace.
the phillipines
there is no peace in war. we need to stop these wars and give peace a chance.
No, having war is never a good option, only the last resort.
Lenin's 3 word promise was "Peace! Bread! Land!"