yes war is the only answer for peace if we didn't have war we would all live in a depressed world and we could never travel because the leaders would act like school children and would not talk to each other and no 1 would be happy
Only for those that die in them.
It depends on your definition of 'peace'. In ancient Rome, Pax Romana (the Roman peace) was achieved by waging war and subjugating all other cultures to their rule. Sure, peace is better than war, but you only have peace when you have killed everyone who doesn't think you should rule the world.
Depends on your definition of "War", but actually, more countries are at peace than at war today (by far).
the phillipines
Peace
No, having war is never a good option, only the last resort.
Peace. War and Peace is a book.
When there is war, there is fighting. People are at odds with each other over one thing or another. When there is not war, there is peace. The word used for when there is no war is peace.
Lenin's 3 word promise was "Peace! Bread! Land!"
Ethiopia in not in war. But it has a low-key insurgency movement in the southern-east. Considering that this only affects a tiny section of the country, we can say that Ethiopia is currently in peace.
This phrase implies that sometimes peace can only be achieved through the use of force or war in order to protect and maintain freedom. It suggests that seeking peace without the ability to defend one's liberties may not lead to lasting peace.
there is no peace in war. we need to stop these wars and give peace a chance.