0
Wikipedia is created by users. The validity of the answers depends on who entered the answer, what references they used and how much they really know. Any good researcher will tell you never to trust what is there, but to always check it against valid sources.
It is a great place to start research from.
I would trust most of it as "probably true", but don't take everything you read there are serious fact, as the user who wrote/edited the article might not of known what he/she was talking about. In other words sometimes it's true and sometimes it's not.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Wiki User
∙ 13y agoSadly, no, it is not always true. Many people have oppurtunities to change information on Wikipedia..and sometimes people put things that are not true on the pages.
Wiki User
∙ 6y agoSome is true and some isn't. Always get a back-up source of information besides Wikipedia (and besides other websites that have just copied what Wikipedia said).
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is the another word for 'true'?
nothing on wikipedia is true
Is all the information on Wikipedia true?
No
What weaknesses does Wikipedia have?
That the information presented on Wikipedia may not be completely true and accurate. In addition to this the answer's on Wikipedia cannot be verified.
Is a contradiction always true?
no it is not always true
What are chemical homologies?
you can always check wikipedia
Is the Gross National Product?
true
Is all of Wikipedia true?
Sadly not all of Wikipedia is true. Wikipedia is an online user generated encyclopedia which can be edited by anyone. Some of the people editing have no idea what they are talking about leading to incorrect content. While there are many people on Wikipedia that try to correct these mistakes, they cannot catch all of them.
Is a tautology always false or true?
Tautologies are always true.
Are old wives tales true?
They are true and not true because in wikipedia it says that some old wives tales are false and some are true
What is always true in a binary compound?
The OR function always results in a true when one input is true.
Is Wikipedia the best encyclopaedia?
no, it is not because sometimes it doesn't give you correct information i wouldn't always trust wikipedia
To achieve rapid development the RAD model assumes the existence of one thing What is it and why is the assumption not always true?
Seriously... why? Are you that lazy that you can't just go read about rapid application development on wikipedia?
