No. It would have to be changed to "You were treated to a great dinner."
Yes, "she treated us to a great dinner" is grammatically correct English.
As in making it grammatically correct? It is written great-grandfather.
i was goa
If you are speaking of "Marion, you are great," yes, that is correct. In English the construction is called "direct address."
Yep, it's correct - English is a great language, isn't it?
The grammatically correct phrase is "the dancers and choreography are great." This is because "dancers" and "choreography" form a compound subject, which requires a plural verb. Since "dancers" is plural, the verb "are" must also be used to maintain subject-verb agreement.
It's the Declaration of Independence. The thirteen colonies declared their independence from Great Britain.
"he is a great chess player" is grammatically correct, but the rest could be better. No one really says footballer, a better choice would be Football player try: "he plays football and chess well." or "he's great at both football and chess."
The subject should be singular, problem, to agree with the verb has, or the verb should be have, not has, to be in agreement with the plural subject, problems.
not really, some very young people have a great extensive vocabulary while many adults have trouble stringing three sentences together which are grammatically correct!
Dinner is the correct spelling of the word which refers to a mealtime."What is for dinner today?"Diner is the correct spelling of the word referring to a café-like restaurant popular in the US, usually at a roadside."The local diner makes great burgers".
"More greater" is not grammatically correct because "greater" already implies a comparison, so adding "more" is redundant. Similarly, "much more greater" is also incorrect because "much" and "more" are both comparative terms. It would be more appropriate to simply use "greater" or "much greater" to convey the desired comparison in a grammatically correct manner.