The correct form is greater, the comparative form of the adjective (great, greater, greatest).
The origin of the word, Greater, is comparative of great, and the First recorded use was in 1882.
No, these are not correct. "Greater" is already a comparative form, and "greatest" is the superlative, so you cannot use "more" with these forms. However, it is correct to say "much greater".
Greater is correct. The frenchified construction with "more" is not exactly wrong, and for some adjectives is it preferred, but in this case it is pretentious and fussy sounding.
"Whiter" or simply "more white" alone are both are acceptable. Examples: This shirt is more white than the other one. This shirt is whiter than the other one.
Both are grammatically correct, depending on how you prefer your sentence to read. Most two syllable adjectives form two forms of the comparative and superlative. "Narrower" is the germanic-rooted comparative form of the adjective "narrow," while "more narrow" is the French-influenced version. "Narrowest" and "most narrow" are both acceptable superlatives.A few other words that are correct both ways are handsome, clever, and simpler. Some say that "commoner" is an acceptable comparative adjective, but "more common" has become much more, well, common. Prefered forms (like much of English) makes a slow and steady tectonic shift as certain usages fall out of practice.
It looks fine, but does not amount to much on its own! Here is a grammatically correct sentence including the words "will not be subject to": Late work will lose marks, but work handed in on time will not be subject to any penalty.
No, that is not correct. First of all 'much' is wrong with 'they'. It could have been "How many are they?. But if you have to ask the price of something you could ask- "How much is it for?" or "How much do they cost?" for more than a single item. In an informal way you might ask "How much for them?" or just "How much?"
Not really, it would be much better to say "You went to America in 1998" because the presence of the date means it was a specific event in the past. I have gone, or you have gone, implies that you went to stay with no intention of returning.
Yes, "is much more easily" is grammatically correct because it follows the correct order of adverbs (much, more, easily) when comparing multiple items or degrees in a sentence.
it is correct to say "much more greater"?
Yes, the sentence is grammatically correct. It compares the level of experience of the two people, emphasizing that she is a more experienced world traveler than the other person.
"How many beans?" is grammatically correct.
It is unknown what you are referring to. Are you asking which statement is grammatically correct?John got shot ORJohn was shot?Think about it. Was is a verb and the sentence 'John was shot' is much more grammatically correct than 'John got shot' which sounds informal and can have multiple meanings.
This sentence is grammatically correct but does not have much meaning.
It should be "The gifts and the treat were a little too much."
They mean much the same but "I am suffering from fever" is grammatically more correct: it is the fever that actually makes you suffer.
Your account has not been generating much traffic.This sentence is grammatically correct. It is negative present perfect continuous.
quel âge as-tu (quite correct)quel âge tu as (not grammatically perfect but much more in use)
"Whiter" or simply "more white" alone are both are acceptable. Examples: This shirt is more white than the other one. This shirt is whiter than the other one.
Are you asking if the sentence 'What is it for me?' is grammatically correct? If so, the answer is 'no'. Here are some variations on that sentence which are grammatically correct, but of course I don't know if any of them is what you meant to say. 'What is in it for me?' (meaning 'What benefit will I get out of it?') 'What is it about me?' (meaning 'What is it about me that causes certain things to keep happening to me?') (Compare 'What is it with me?') 'What is there for me?' (meaning 'Which of those things are intended for me?' or 'How much of that is intended for me?')