"More greater" is not grammatically correct because "greater" already implies a comparison, so adding "more" is redundant. Similarly, "much more greater" is also incorrect because "much" and "more" are both comparative terms. It would be more appropriate to simply use "greater" or "much greater" to convey the desired comparison in a grammatically correct manner.
"Whiter" or simply "more white" alone are both are acceptable. Examples: This shirt is more white than the other one. This shirt is whiter than the other one.
Ah, what a lovely question! Both "narrower" and "more narrow" are grammatically correct, my friend. You can use either one depending on your personal preference. Just remember to be gentle with yourself and trust your instincts when choosing which one to use in your beautiful creations.
It looks fine, but does not amount to much on its own! Here is a grammatically correct sentence including the words "will not be subject to": Late work will lose marks, but work handed in on time will not be subject to any penalty.
No, that is not correct. First of all 'much' is wrong with 'they'. It could have been "How many are they?. But if you have to ask the price of something you could ask- "How much is it for?" or "How much do they cost?" for more than a single item. In an informal way you might ask "How much for them?" or just "How much?"
Not really, it would be much better to say "You went to America in 1998" because the presence of the date means it was a specific event in the past. I have gone, or you have gone, implies that you went to stay with no intention of returning.
Yes, "is much more easily" is grammatically correct because it follows the correct order of adverbs (much, more, easily) when comparing multiple items or degrees in a sentence.
it is correct to say "much more greater"?
Put a comma or dash between 'traveller' and 'much.'
"How many beans?" is grammatically correct.
No. Weather is not countable, so therefore you would not use "much". How is the weather? Oh, it's pretty cold out today!
It is unknown what you are referring to. Are you asking which statement is grammatically correct?John got shot ORJohn was shot?Think about it. Was is a verb and the sentence 'John was shot' is much more grammatically correct than 'John got shot' which sounds informal and can have multiple meanings.
This sentence is grammatically correct but does not have much meaning.
It would be much cleaner as:"Can you have the sheriff serve the subpoena?"or - "Will the sheriff serve the subpoena?"
It should be "The gifts and the treat were a little too much."
They mean much the same but "I am suffering from fever" is grammatically more correct: it is the fever that actually makes you suffer.
Your account has not been generating much traffic.This sentence is grammatically correct. It is negative present perfect continuous.
quel âge as-tu (quite correct)quel âge tu as (not grammatically perfect but much more in use)