yes it is true
Fusion reactions in bigger stars happen at a slower rate than in smaller stars because the higher pressure and temperature in bigger stars allow them to overcome the repulsive forces between positively charged atomic nuclei, enabling fusion to occur even at lower rates. Additionally, bigger stars have a larger supply of fuel, which can sustain fusion over longer periods compared to smaller stars.
that is not true the sun is bigger than the moon The moon is much, much, much smaller than the sun. It only looks bigger because the sun is much farther away than the moon. Many stars are much bigger than the sun, but they only look like points of light because they are so much more farther away.
Yes, stars are relatively much more bigger than our earth. Sun, is the closest star to the earth. Sun's diameter is around 109 times that of the earth. Sun is one of the medium sized stars. We cannot imagine the size of the red giants like Aldebaran , Betelgeuse , etc. They are much more larger and massive than the sun also.
No, dwarf stars are smaller in size and mass compared to our Sun. They are classified by their lower luminosity and surface temperature.
if a is bigger than b and b is bigger than c a must be bigger than c... Transitivity
true, a rhino is bigger then a cat.
Yes, a star is generally much larger than a planet. Stars are massive celestial bodies that generate light and heat through nuclear fusion, whereas planets are smaller bodies that orbit stars.
yes it is true
In geography its bigger. But there are more people in Texas than Alaska.
I don't think that there is a number bigger than its square as you are timesing the number Not true. Any number between 0 and 1 is bigger than its square.
more stars than grains of sand. i know . . .i cant believe it either, but its true.
some stars are a 1000 times bigger than our star(sun) so they are ginornmous. so no matter how big a star we find, in time we will find one biggert than that one. there is no true number in size