Yes, stars are relatively much more bigger than our earth. Sun, is the closest star to the earth. Sun's diameter is around 109 times that of the earth. Sun is one of the medium sized stars. We cannot imagine the size of the red giants like Aldebaran , Betelgeuse , etc. They are much more larger and massive than the sun also.
Well sometimes it is and sometimes it isn't. That old saying is not nessary true. Because there are plenty of planets in the universe that are the same size as earth but have less gravity than earth.
Some scientists believe that the moon was once a chunk of the earth that broke off long ago and became our moon, and if that's true, it isn't possible that the moon would be bigger than the earth.
Yes, a star is generally much larger than a planet. Stars are massive celestial bodies that generate light and heat through nuclear fusion, whereas planets are smaller bodies that orbit stars.
the sun is bigger than the earth - fact you could fit over 1,million earths inside it it just looks small because it is 900,million miles away i got all this i formashion from this websight and google,yahoo and its all true is that anougf proof for anybody who dosent think it is true
False. The statement is not accurate as the process of stars huddling together would not lead to the Earth becoming a puddle. The Earth's state is influenced by a combination of factors, including its distance from the Sun and its composition, rather than the behavior of stars in the sky.
yes it is true
Not Earth's moon, but some moons of other planets are bigger than the earth (none in our solar system).
No. Mercury is about 40% the width and only 5% the mass of Earth.
No. Of course not. The universe is big enough to hold earth and all the other planets in the Milky Way Galaxy and all other galaxies and the sun and the moon and the stars. There is no way that the universe could be smaller that Earth. =)
Fusion reactions in bigger stars happen at a slower rate than in smaller stars because the higher pressure and temperature in bigger stars allow them to overcome the repulsive forces between positively charged atomic nuclei, enabling fusion to occur even at lower rates. Additionally, bigger stars have a larger supply of fuel, which can sustain fusion over longer periods compared to smaller stars.
That's not true at all. Whoever told you that is either misinformed or else pulling your chain.
Yes. Gravity is inversely proportional to distance.
True. The rotation of the Earth causes different stars to become visible at night as it changes our perspective in relation to the stars. This effect is known as diurnal motion, where stars appear to rise in the east and set in the west due to the Earth's rotation.
that is not true the sun is bigger than the moon The moon is much, much, much smaller than the sun. It only looks bigger because the sun is much farther away than the moon. Many stars are much bigger than the sun, but they only look like points of light because they are so much more farther away.
No, dwarf stars are smaller in size and mass compared to our Sun. They are classified by their lower luminosity and surface temperature.
Well sometimes it is and sometimes it isn't. That old saying is not nessary true. Because there are plenty of planets in the universe that are the same size as earth but have less gravity than earth.
if a is bigger than b and b is bigger than c a must be bigger than c... Transitivity