answersLogoWhite

0

because even though he was king for ten years he only spent six months in England

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Why do people think of king Richard III as a villain?

people think of King Richard III is that his a bad king because she always have a sex


Why was king Richard the lionheart a better king than his brother King John?

That really depends on your point of view. I think it is accepted that in terms of being warlike that Richard was the more aggressive, but whether that makes him a good or bad king is difficult to prove. Similarly John appears to be manipulated by circumstances by the barons in England at the time. But apparrently during his reign King Richard was only in England for less than 1 year, so the effects of English politics affected him only in a limited way. Richard was busy campaining in Palestine & imprisoned in Bohemia ? or somewhere. A huge ransom was paid for his release. It remains that Richard Lionheart as far more Richard Coer de Leon, more french than English. this is also true, that Richard the 'lionheart' did not speak a word of English so calling him an English king over a french one would be completely unnecessary. Another answer: King Richard cut a dashing figure as he made his trip around England and then vanished to the Holy Land. John then took over and raised taxes, and raised taxes, and raised taxes. While not an especially good administrator, King Richard kept his word and ruled briefly. King John was otherwise. King John repudiated the Magna Carta he signed at Runnymede. He then fined the Barons that made him sign it. John was one of the worst kings England ever had. John's real problem was that people compared him to his father, Henry II. King Henry wanted England prosperous and established policies that would make England that way. King John threatened to undo his father's work.


Was King Richard III a bad guy?

He was a good king however the mis-reports and Shakespeare's story are wrong so in fact he was a nice king.


Why King John was a worse king then King Richard?

Richard I reigned from 1189-1199. He spent only six months out of those ten years in England ... He shamelessly misused and mulcted England as a source of revenue for his escapades as a crusader.


Is Henry a bad or good king?

a bad king


Was Richard II a good king?

He was really bad. He killed 2,700 prisoners just because Salidan was a little wait to come get them. King Richard III had many bad points but however disturbing they were, they were all in good favour. The bad things he done were obviously not ment to be comitted, but however it just proved how much determination he had to become King. King Richard the third was very heartless man and didn't have any consideration for others that witnessed things, or even those of whom he married. Just asking, but can someone identify the bad points of Richard III, and also, who is Salidan. (i found that he/she was a Muslim leader associated with Richard I, not Richard III)


Did bad King John have any children?

There were five children, Henry, Richard, Joan, Isabella and Eleanor


Was king Charles a bad king?

yes he was.


Why was king Jon a bad king?

because he didnt do what he needed to do as a orginal king will.


Was King John such a bad king after all?

Half.


Was king edward the second a bad king?

He was average.


What type of king was Edward VI?

A bad king