True
Answer The Uniform Code of Military Justice is the law by which the military services operate. It is the Constitution, Bill or Rights and the law for the soldier. It is used to punish criminals in the military.
US military personnel DO have Constitutional rights but in many respects the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) does not parallel the civilian court system. The two are not really comparable.
justice
Department of Justice.
The US Army does not "beat their own men." Physical or corporal punishment is a violation of UCMJ (The Uniform Code of Military Justice), and is punishable by Courts Martial.
Enforce military rules and regulations and provide security at military bases. They also take over in Marshall Law.
The US Department of Justice
The United States Department of Justice as well as the Federal Trade Commission has jurisdiction over violations of antitrust laws. Alleged violations are investigated by federal agents and if found to violate any antitrust laws, legal action is initiated.
The Department of Justice handles violations of antitrust laws. The purpose of these laws is to maintain a competitive marketplace.,
Dept Of Justice
Yes, violations of the Law of Armed Conflict can not be defended by "I was just following orders". You cannot defend yourself by saying you were following orders that are illegal to begin with. If you followed an order that you know is to be illegal, you're just as guilty as your officers that commanded you to. If an officer gave me an order to shoot a disarmed and surrendered enemy combatant and I did, I'm just as guilty as my officer telling me to. It's not that hard.
No, military people are regulated by the Uniform Code of Military Justice, not the civilian codes like you mentioned. A little more to the answer: someone in the U.S. military can use class 3 items while in the military for official purposes, but otherwise, military personnel are subject to the laws of the state where they are located when not on base and not acting in an official capacity for the military.