• 
• 1 answer

Article 92 - Failure to Obey Orders or Regulations, Sub-Part 3, of the UCMJ.

• 
• 1 answer

Article 92, UCMJ. There are two types of dereliction: wilful and negligent punished under the same article. Note sometimes they also charge an orders violation, also under Article 92 for the same or similar conduct.

• 
• 1 answer

Cruelty, maltreatment, and/or oppression of a subordinate by a higher ranking person, with a maximum penalty of dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay & allowances, and confinement for 1 yr.

• 
• 1 answer

If you are in a state pension system in Illinois, ask your HR department if Texas and Illinois have a lateral pension transfer agreement. First find out if Texas even has a state retirement sytstem though...most states don't.




If what you mean is you have retired and are collecting your pension and want to move to the warmer climate...i don't think your State (or country) of residence effects the pension benefit you are collecting.

If you haven't retired yet and are continuing employment with the same employer, again the change shouldn't matter - except that wages may be different in the new state and pensions are generally based on earnings.

• 
• 1 answer

Yes and no, the military can recall you if you are suspected of having commited an offense while you were on active duty. The offense must be Courts-Martial level. They cannot recall you to give you an Article 15. Other than that scenario, no, you will not fall under UCMJ.

• 
• 1 answer

It is a Court Martial offense in the military, and would result in discharge under less then honorable conditions as a minimum. It could also result in a considerable jail term. While the above response is essentially true, there are some other important details to be discussed. First, courts martial for desertion are rare, as demonstrating that a service member has left the military with either a) the intent of never returning or b) the intent of shirking hazardous duty is challenging. In the recent wars, only those folks who have fled the country for Canada and have subsequently been deported to the US have been tried for desertion. That said, courts martials are generally avoided and discharges for AWOL/UA under Other Than Honorable (OTH) conditions are fairly common. But again, this depends on the branch of the service and how long the member has been absent.

• 
• 1 answer

• 
• 1 answer

Making a statement does not require you to be read your rights. If you have been charged with something, they need to read you your rights.

• 
• 1 answer

this is the only law that i know of that will allow a felon to leagally own a firearm.....i have heard so many people say that no matter what a felon can never own a firearm,well this law says you can!!1

• 
• 1 answer

• 
• 1 answer

General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand, or an administrative censure or written "chewing out" by a general officer given to a soldier for a failure to comply with established standards. May stand alone or be accompanied by an Article 15 under UCMJ. The written reprimand may be filed in either the Soldier's Military Personnel Record Jacket (MPRJ) or Official Military Personnel File (OMPF), usually for the term of assignment under the general court-martial jurisdiction or up to three years, whichever is sooner.

• 
• 1 answer

Go to the Jag office and talk to a lawyer, they are there to protect you.

• 
• 1 answer

Dianabol or Methandrostenolone and all of it's derivatives and foreign brand names is a schedule III drug in the same category as Amphetamines, meth-amphetamines and cocaine. It is illegal to purchase, possess or sell in the United States. One can only assume that it is in violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice as well.

• 
• 1 answer

That is covered in Army Pamplet 600-35 - RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN SOLDIERS OF DIFFERENT RANKS

• 
• 1 answer

Original Caste from Canada and Coven from the USA Coven in 1971

Original Caste in 1970

• 
• 1 answer

It would end very badly, you can get kicked out of the army, and if you have that on your record, good luck not trying to steal somebody's identity to get a job!

• 
• 1 answer

They used Poison gas, we had the creeping barrage.

• 
• 1 answer

134

• 
• 1 answer

I belive that all of them would support this. It was common practice at the time for Generals, Admirals and Captains of War ships to handle matters in this way.

• 
• 1 answer

86

• 
• 2 answers

It is a violation of Article 134 of the UCMJ.

• 
• 1 answer

ART. 136. AUTHORITY TO ADMINISTER OATHS AND ACT AS NOTARY.

It relates to all persons in the military and it's proper authorities. It states positions and ranks on active duty or performing inactive-duty training that may administer oaths for the purpose of military administration.

• 
• 2 answers

• 
• 1 answer

true or false

• 
• 1 answer

Article 134