Bilbo baggins is in The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings and so is Gandalf. The Shire is also involved. Gollum (smeagol) and the ring are also involved.
The Hobbit is considered the prequel and occurs about 60 years in time before the Lord of the Rings. It is about how the One Ring came back to knowledge in Middle-earth after being hidden for so many years.The Silmarillion contains portions of the events from the beginning of Middle-earth right up to the destruction of Beleriand and the destruction of Numenor. It is far more like a history book than a story.The Hobbit. It tells of the life and adventures of Bilbo Baggins, Frodo's uncle. A movie is being made called "The Hobbit" in 2012. Peter Jackson comes back to direct another masterpiece.This may be slightly pedantic, but just to be precise:Technically the book The Lord of the Rings doesn't have a prequel. A prequel is written after a publication in question but describes the events that happened before the events in said publication.The Hobbit (book) was written before The Lord of the Rings. The Lord of the Rings is the sequel to The Hobbit, but The Hobbit is not the prequel to The Lord of the Rings.However, the movie The Hobbit is the prequel to The Lord of the Rings movie.The Hobbit
they both produce things like cones and flowers and both have annual rings of xylem in the stems.
Very few similarities exist between Mars and Saturn. Mars is a smallish terrestrial (or rocky) planet, while Saturn is a large gas giant planet. Mars has two small satellites, while Saturn has dozens of large satellites, and millions of small ones that form the "rings" of Saturn.
What the hell are you talking about? Peter Jackson made the Lord of the Rings trilogy in the late 90s and they were released in 2001, 2002, and 2003
Peter Jackson will be producing two prequels to The Lord of the Rings: The Hobbit and an "in-between" movie set between the ending of The Hobbit and LotR. There will be no sequels to the Return of the King/the Lord of the Rings trilogy. plae make a nothar lord of the rings because iam a big fan. for exsample the ring was a fake when it hit the larver
The Hobbit, but really, you should read the silmarillion. It explains the whole Lord of the Rings Lore. but the hobbit, then the lord of the rings; Although, not all of the films for the Hobbit have come out
The Lord of the Rings
John Ronald Reuel Tolkien wrote both The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings.
Tolkien (The Hobbit, The Lord of the Rings); Terry Brooks (The Sword of Shanara).Tolkien (The Hobbit, The Lord of the Rings); Terry Brooks (The Sword of Shanara).Tolkien (The Hobbit, The Lord of the Rings); Terry Brooks (The Sword of Shanara).Tolkien (The Hobbit, The Lord of the Rings); Terry Brooks (The Sword of Shanara).
wellington
Just one.
The Hobbit, The Silmarillion
the book called the hobbit
Yes it shows the background of the Lord of the Rings
The sequel to The Hobbit is The Lord of the Rings.
J.R.R. Tolkien wrote The Hobbit first (in the 1930s, released in 1937). He wrote The Lord of the Rings between 1937 and 1950, and was published in 1954/5; he started work on The Lord of the Rings after The Hobbit was published.He had actually written the stories that make up The Silmarillion even earlier, while recovering in a hospital during world war 1 from combat wounds. But while many parts of both The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings stories refer to events in The Silmarillion, Tolkien never felt those stories were finished and was always reediting them throughout his life, so he never made a serious attempt to get them published himself.
No.