0
Many republicans in the senate objected to Article 10 of the plan for the league of nations because they feared that?
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
They feared that Article 10 could be used to drag the united states into unpoPular foreign wars.
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why did republicans object to article 10 of the league's charter?
Assuming you mean the charter of the League of Nations, Republicans objected because it obligated the U.S. to defend member nations if they were attacked.
Why did the republicans object to the league of nations?
Many Republicans objected to the League of Nations because they believed it would infringe upon American sovereignty and potentially drag the United States into future wars. They were concerned that joining the League could undermine the country's policy of non-entanglement in foreign affairs. Additionally, some Republicans were critical of President Woodrow Wilson's role in negotiating the Treaty of Versailles and saw the League as an extension of his policies.
Which article in the US Constitution provides for the nations debts?
Article 6
America did not join the league of Nations because?
the U.S. Senate did not want the country to join
How did the US react to the Treaty of Versailles?
Many Americans objected to the settlement and especially to president wilsons league of nations.
What was the reaction from the other countries toward Axis expansion?
It was condemned by the League of Nations and most of its constituent nations objected, but lacking an enforcement arm or capacity to force conflicting nations to mediate, no proclomation of condemnation achieved anything.
Why didn't the Unite States join the League of Nations?
republicans in congress opposed the idea
Article X of the league World War 1?
it was an article that promised peace between nations worldwide
Article 5?
This article declares that when the need arises, member nations will engage in collective defense to help ally nations. It has only been implemented once and that was during 9/11.
Why did Republicans reject the Treaty of Versailles?
Because the Treaty, and the League of Nations especially, were the work of President Wilson, who was a Democrat. Then, as now, the Republicans are ready to sacrifice the good of the nation and the world if they convince themselves they can gain some partisan political advantage for the Republican Party by doing so.
Is the United Nations a toothless bulldog?
Yes. I refer you to this article: http://www.arabamericannews.com/news/index.php?mod=article&cat=OtherOpinions&article=2032
What was the argument of republicans against the league of nations?
it would draw the united states into conflicts all over the world.
