0
Northern states objected to admitting Missouri as a slave state because?
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
It would increase the power of the southern states in the senate.
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
Wiki User
∙ 10y agoIt would create a problem between the boarder states
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Many northern whites objected to slavery because they believed it?
Before, during, and after the American Civil War, it can be fairly said that many northern whites (and others) objected to slavery on very simple moral grounds. They opposed the practice within America or anywhere because of what they saw as its inherent wrong: no human being is rightly held in bondage to any other on the basis of supposed racial, ethnic, economic, or any other inferiority.
Why did federalist object to the Bill of Rights?
The federalist objected to the Bill of Rights because they believed it gave the government enough power, but not to much to prevent tyranny.
Puritans objected to the way Queen Elizabeth I's bishops interpreted the Protestant doctrine of predestination because the bishops argued that?
Dafuq?
Why did Hitler attack the British?
Because they were his enemy during a time of war.
How was the buffalo important to the Missouri people?
because i don't know
What was the reason northern states objected to Missouri being added as a slave state?
Because they were fighting against slaves and did not want to make things worse.
Many northern whites objected to slavery because they believed it?
Before, during, and after the American Civil War, it can be fairly said that many northern whites (and others) objected to slavery on very simple moral grounds. They opposed the practice within America or anywhere because of what they saw as its inherent wrong: no human being is rightly held in bondage to any other on the basis of supposed racial, ethnic, economic, or any other inferiority.
Why did some northern delegates argue that enslaved people should be counted for taxation but not representation?
Northern states objected because enslaved people were legally considered property. So, some argued that as property, Slaves should be counted for taxation but not representations.
Why have countries objected to Japan's trade?
because poo
Why did the northerners protest Douglas's plan to repeal The Missouri Compromise?
The northerners protests DouglasÕs plan to repeal the Missouri Compromise because it would have made slavery legal in the northern territories. The Missouri Compromise had outlawed slavery in territories and new states above the Missouri Compromise line.
What are the cons of the Missouri compromise?
Good question! The North benefited from the Missouri Compromise, because they received another state in the North (Maine) that did not allow slavery (because the North didn't like slavery.) The South benefited from the Missouri Compromise, because they received another southern state (Missouri) that was capable of having slaves. This way, both the North and the South had an equal amount of 12 Northern states and 12 Southern states.
Why did federalist object to the Bill of Rights?
The federalist objected to the Bill of Rights because they believed it gave the government enough power, but not to much to prevent tyranny.
Why people objected to Kielder water?
because the water was too wet yeah, ya get me?
Why did Socrates objected to democracy?
because it would put power in the hands of the non experts
Why did the republicans nominate Fremont for the president in 1856?
He was in favor of admitting California and Kansas as free states.
How did Iowa get its shape?
On iowa western border the missouri river helped shape western border and on the eastern border mississippi river shapes eastern border of iowa mostly the rivers helped shape iowa because it was surrounded by water. The northern border with Minnesota it was given a random state line because minnestoa wasnt a state yet so they quickly had to do that to make sure iowa had northern border. On the southern border with missouri(state) there was problems because of the state line because of improper surveying so it caused iowa and missouri to go to war and have surveyors resurvey the the border.
What are pros and cons of arguing?
Good question! The North benefited from the Missouri Compromise, because they received another state in the North (Maine) that did not allow slavery (because the North didn't like slavery.) The South benefited from the Missouri Compromise, because they received another southern state (Missouri) that was capable of having slaves. This way, both the North and the South had an equal amount of 12 Northern states and 12 Southern states.
