The federalist objected to the Bill of Rights because they believed it gave the government enough power, but not to much to prevent tyranny.
The federalist objected to the Bill of Rights because they believed it gave the government enough power, but not to much to prevent tyranny.
The federalist objected to the Bill of Rights because they believed it gave the government enough power, but not to much to prevent tyranny.
The Federalist
The Anti-Federalist advocated for the Bill of Rights. The Federalist were against including a bill of rights until Jefferson convinced Madison that "half a loaf is better than no bread".
That the Constitution had no bill of rights.
James mandison
the Federalist were all for the constitution and the anti-federalist were against it because they thought it needed a bill of rights to protect individual rights!
The Federalist
It lacked the Bill of Rights
They wanted a Bill of Rights, guaranteeing personal rights to the citizens (speech, religion, etc.). See Wikipedia search: 'Bill of Rights'.
The Anti-Federalist advocated for the Bill of Rights. The Federalist were against including a bill of rights until Jefferson convinced Madison that "half a loaf is better than no bread".
No he did not he was a Federalist, The Anti-Federalist wanted the Bill of Rights
a bill of rights
no it was the bill of rights
the Bill of Rights
Bill of rights
Whether a bill of rights was necessary to include in the Constitution.
The Federalist Papers came before the Bill of Rights
The Bill of Rights is referred to as anti-federalist legacy because it takes away and limits the rights of its citizens. It provides an overall security of certain rights but does not guarantee others.