f you've been following the story of Thane Heins and have been looking for an update to his story, I had one appear this weekend in the Toronto Star. It was a year ago when I first wrote about Ottawa-born Heins, who says he has developed an electrical generator that redirects the energy in "Back EMF" that usually slows down an electrical motor-generator as it accepts load. In other words, Heins claims to have eliminated the magnetic friction and replaced it with magnetic acceleration. He calls this effect "regenerative acceleration," but those who are skeptical of his claims say that acceleration does not equate to power/torque/work and that Heins has failed to demonstrate there is such a link.
Is it just a more - potentially much more -efficient motor? Or is it, well, more than that? Heins says it's not perpetual motion or an overunity machine, yet, but he believes he can get it there as he continues to refine his prototype. I won't go into much more detail, you can read the article if you want an update. I decided to do an update after receiving an e-mail from Lee Smolin, a highly respected theoretical physicist at the Perimeter Institute in Waterloo. Smolin said the public deserved an update to show that Heins is misguided. I'll let the reader make that judgement. All I can say is that Heins continues to press on, and bit by bit is making what he feels is progress. The cast of characters he's interacted with over the past year range from rockstar Neil Young to UFO researcher Steven Greer, who claims to be an ET contactee.
I like this story, mostly because Heins is doggedly determined and acutely aware of how controversial his claims are, but at the same time he isn't prepared to censor himself. He tells it like he sees it, and invites others to come and kick the tires. I didn't mention this in the story, but he's decided to take a kind of open-source approach to licensing his technology. The idea, the way I understand it, is that others can license it and build real-world applications on top and that all members of the licensing network get to share in the advancements and the revenues that are generated - assuming it gets to that stage.
Obviously, as attempts are made to put this technology into a real application, we'll know once and for all whether it works or falls flat. That's perhaps my biggest criticism: Heins has spent the past year refining a prototype that really doesn't answer the questions that people have. Regardless of how simple it is, all people want is to see the technology used in some way where real work - beyond acceleration - is clearly observable and irrefutable.
That said, I'm curious. Besides, I like an underdog and am a sucker for a good story, no matter how it ends. Some will say that by giving him publicity I'm encouraging him, giving him credibility, and helping perpetuate some sort of lie or con job. Having been a reporter and columnist at one of the largest newspapers in North America, I can tell you this: I, like many of my colleagues, have probably done more to unknowingly spread lies and con jobs by writing about so-called credible people and companies. At least with Heins, he wears his heart and motivations on his sleeve.
The most efficient way to generate electricity is with hydro electric turbines.
Most vehicles harm the environment, including electric trains, however, electric vehicles are cleaner than gasoline and diesel powered vehicles because some electricity is generated from renewable sources like water, wind and sun.
Depending on the application, electricity can be better, or worse than gas. If it is an application involving rotation, then electricity is better than gas, in terms of efficiency, budget, reliability, and easy operation. But if it a heating application then usually, gas is beter than electricity, in all the above mentioned terms. Electricity, gas can be a bit "hazardous" to your health.
It releases less carbon dioxide then coal or oil, so it is better for the environment.One of the biggest advantages of using natural gas is the fact that there is so much of it. The US has the 6th largest reserve of natural gas in the world.
Copper
Because they are more efficient.
Yes, of course:Coal is the highest energy resource in environment pollution. Burning coal to produce electricity results in global warming and acid rain.Natural gas is used also in generating electricity. It is less environment polluting than coal.Water falls, wind, solar, geothermal, and biomass are also used in generating electricity. They make no waste, and they cannot be used up.Nuclear energy is very promising, reliable, cheap, and efficient source of electricity generation.
All DC Motors can generate electricity according to their size & input volt. 24 volt DC Motor is best for generate electricity. Even you can generate up to 24 volt AC. The big size of Motor is also depends to generate more ampere (current). Remember 24 volt DC Motor which have less RPM without gear is better & efficient for generate electricity than having the more RPM (Round Per Minute). So try it & generate electricity. (for further information, feel free to ask any thing regarding electricity, "admnpmiu_tariq@yahoo.com")
It is possible to generate electricity from a propeller shaft as the fristion waves travell across it, it will generate a minute amount. for it to generate better the inside needs to stripped out as most of them have card board in them to deaden sound
If you mean by helping us use less fossil fuels, yes. Solar Cells generate electricity from solar energy released by the sun.
The purpose of a generator is to generate electricity. An electric generator would be redundant. It would need electricity to make electricity and when there is a power outage there is not electricity.
Dishwashers, especially energy efficient ones, are known to be better for the environment when used in full and with minimal pre-rinsing.
Currenty electric vehicles are the most fuel efficient vehicles and are better for the environment. Hybrids and hydrogen vehicles are also good for protecting the environment and pretty efficient.
Cold water is better for the enviorment, because it uses "NO" electricity and power.
You better have a 10,000 watt capable generator.
New energy resources better for the environment are called renewable or alternate energy forms. They include solar, wind, water, hydro, tidal and wave, geothermal, ocean thermal, biomass, biofuel and hydrogen.
They ae better for being energy efficient and saving on your electricity bill,also better for the eniornment,there will plenty of light.
LEDs are definitely better than the ordinary light bulbs because they're more energy efficient, and you'll be able to get a lot of savings since you don't need to change your bulbs every now and then.