answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

It's difficult to prove that a vehicle was damaged during towing unless the damage is directly related to the way the vehicle was towed. Some examples would be AWD (All Wheel Drive) vehicles being towed on 2 wheels destroying the drive train components, damaged bumpers, or bent control arms from tow hooks. As well, personal property is the owners responsibility to keep out of the vehicle at all times. Your best bet is going to be filing a claim with your auto insurance agent (given you had insurance at this point in time.)

If you are unable to do so due to being under, or uninsured - contact the bank that owns the vehicle and find out who the tow company that reposessed the vehicle. You may be able to take them to small claims court, and if not get money back on the deal - have the bank reduce the amount you owe if they are found At Fault for the damage. If you own the vehicle, and you have taken delivery of it back from the impound, an insurance claim, or small claims court are your best options.

If you have photographs of the vehicle taken just before it was reposessed, they will be your best tools in either case to prove the condition of the vehicle was changed during the process.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: My car was damaged after the repo man picked it up property was stolen as well what are my rights?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Repairing or paying for property stolen or damaged?

Restitution.


Reparing or repaying for property that is stolen or damaged which contains eleven letters?

reparations


What is the difference between Possession of Stolen Property and Receiving Stolen Property?

Possession means that you have the property, chances are you knew it was stolen. Receiving Stolen Property means that you got it and you knew it was stolen. Typically this would be the person that bought it from a thief.


Can you press charges after stolen property is returned?

can i press charges if i accept return of my stolen property


What does dealing in stolen property mean?

Someone is dealing in stolen property by buying or selling property they know to have been obtained unlawfully.


Can you go to jail for buying stolen property?

yes, you can. its still stolen.


Why are you being charged with receiving stolen property with no property?

Not enough information to answer the question. MY GUESS would be that law enforcement can PROVE that you DID once have the stolen property in your possession.


Is it perverse to seek retribution for stolen property Marigolds?

No, it is not perverse to seek retribution for stolen property because seeking punishment for someone who has stolen from you is natural and appropriate, not wrong.


What is pc496a?

receiving stolen property


If your husband has stolen property can you be held liable for not returning it?

That could be a stretch, but you can possibly be charged with knowingly having stolen property and not reporting it.


What is the minimum sentence for dealing in stolen property?

About the same as for the person who initially stole the property. Since you are selling known stolen property, one could face the same charges or more. See: http://pelleylawgroup.com/practice-areas/property-crimes/possession-of-stolen-property/


What recourse do you have if you unknowingly purchase stolen property?

Absolutely not. Recovered stolen property is returned to the rightful owner. If a reasonable person knows, or has reason to know, that property that has come into their possession, through gift or purchase, is potentially stolen, and that person maintains that property, they are guilty of possession of stolen property. This means that if your friend sells you a $2000.00 stereo for $100.00 (which is obviously a deal too good to be true) and you keep the property believing that it may be stolen, you could be charged with a crime. You should also keep in mind that you can say that you didn't believe that the property was stolen when you kept it; however, if a jury of twelve people think that you should have had enough common sense to know the property was stolen, you could still be convicted.