1. Water
2. Grain/wheat
3. Heat from sun and Earth's core
true
Oxygen, Heat, moisture, all the core things a living thing needs, since microbes carry out decomposition.
This depends on what you mean by substance and object. In today's colloquial speech, substance usually means chemical substance. "Object" is merely a synonym for "thing". Understood this way, the relationship between object and substance then is that objects are made of one or more substances. However, there are a few meanings of substance. The term first appears on the scientific landscape in philosophy and the philosophical definition is the canonical intellectual meaning. Aristotle, for instance, calls substances any unity of form and matter, which is called hylomorphism (for him, only living things were true substances, as opposed to technological things). You, for example, are a substance. Substances are tricky because on the one hand, they are those things which persist through change (you can grow and change, but you remain the same person), but on the other hand, properties that can change without destroying a thing change because the substance changes. So in the first case, substance is a bit like an unchangeable core of what a thing is, on the other hand it's the entire thing. I don't want to get too deep into the metaphysics, but the important thing to remember is that each living thing for Aristotle is a substance, a single thing and not just a heap of other stuff. (For some atomists, atoms are the only true substances, everything else being something like a pile of atoms.) As I said, form and matter are what compose substance. Form is that which makes a thing what it is. Matter, however, here doesn't mean what we mean today (today, matter, oddly enough, is what chemical substance means today, or what secondary matter means for Aristotle). It means the principle by which form is manifested materially. Forms cannot exist by themselves; you can only have things which are enformed. Form needs matter and this unity is what makes things exist as objects. Thus, objects are things and substances are a subclass of things.
Yes, as long as a substance is 100% (purity), it is considered as a pure substance. But logically, there is no such thing as a pure substance.
Because at the time of the first living thing we know that there was no free oxygen in the environment.
No. It's extracted from a plant, which is a living thing, but is not a living organism in itself. It's a substance.
Every living thing needs oxygen.
a living thing needs 1. water 2. food/nutrients 3. shelter 4. sun to survive
ozone
A living thing is something that needs water and oxygen a non living thing does not need those things it can live without it.:)
you can tell if this "thing'' if it can move, or it needs to survive by food , and if it can grow, it takes amounts of investigation to see if this"thing" is a living thing.
A living thing is something that needs water and oxygen a non living thing does not need those things it can live without it.:)
the environment needs water because every living thing needs water
No. An amphibian is an animal; a living thing. Water is a substance; it is not alive.
They are alive. They move, breathe, make waste and reproduce themselves. Dead or non living doesn't do any of those. Living thing needs and uses energy.
no because it needs a cell to live
NO, because water does not breathe, feel, see or have any similar characteristics to a living thing such as a human or plant. So water is not a living thing, but currently every known living thing needs water to survive.