The question does not make sense - BUT - it sounds as if you are trying to describe DOUBLE JEOPARDY.
A person can't be punished for being an alcoholic because that would be considered an illegal crime of status. Alcoholics can, however, be punished for their intoxicated behaviors.
Tartarus was a space in which horrible people were punished. Tartarus powers created special punishment depending on the person.
Sometimes. It depends on the person and the punishment. Some people commit an offense, get caught and punished, and stop doing it because they expect that they would be punished again. Some people do it again because the punishment was not as bad as committing the offense was good. And some people simply never believe they will get caught next time.
trial : Allah will ask every person about his life , why he did and why he didn't , it stage before punishment . punishment: after trial some person go hell because of his bad life so he Must be punished to remove the bad things from his heart then he will go to paradise
Justice is when someone gets a punishment/reward that they diserve. For christians, it is when a person who has sinned gets punished or a person who is riteous gets praised.
It's called "falaka". Falaka is a way of punishment which is done by hitting someones tied feet with a stick and it's considered a very humiliating way of punishment in Turkish culture. The person who is punishing the victim is considered Superior to the person who is punished.
Positive punishment involves adding an aversive stimulus to decrease the likelihood of a behavior occurring again. Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus to decrease the likelihood of a behavior occurring again. Essentially, positive punishment adds something unpleasant while negative punishment takes away something valued.
because even though they arent too bad, they are still bad and wrong and deserve punishment to make the person not want to do the crime again
If it's simply used as punishment - that is, for revenge or to relieve frustrations in the person inflicting the punishment, it makes the punisher feel temporarily better. However, it brutalizes and desensitizes the person doing the punishment and causes anger and resentment in the person punished, which will cause later problems all round. If the intention is to stop the person receiving corporal punishment from misbehaving again, it doesn't work. For example, you might hear a parent say of a child, 'I keep smacking, but it does no good,' If you keep hitting another person and they still repeat the behaviour you want to discourage, clearly it isn't working, is it?
Certainty has a greater impact on deterrence than severity of punishment. ... Research underscores the more significant role that certainty plays in deterrence than severity — it is the certainty of being caught that deters a person from committing crime, not the fear of being punished or the severity of the punishment.
The word you're looking for is "double jeopardy." This legal principle prevents a person from being prosecuted or punished twice for the same offense.
Jem is punished for destroying Mrs. Dubose's camellias. His punishment is that he has to apologize to her in person and then read to her every afternoon for a month.