Regimental number 5966 was issued to Pte. Melville Jamieson of Thorneycroft's M.I. He served from 19 March to 17 November 1900 in F Co. There is no trace that the number was re-issued after Jamieson left. Have you checked the medal for renaming?
The TMI History has just been published together with a roll of all men who served with them. Contact me on jerwfd@optusnet.com.au for more details.
Cheers, RD
Cavalry/Infantry/DragoonCavalry rides to the battle and fights mounted. Traditionally on horseback, but motorized with humvees and helicopters nowdays.Infantry walks to the battle and fights on foot. But today, they may get to the front by truck, airplane, etc.Dragoons rode to the front but fought on foot. So today's infantry are really dragoons, but that term has disappeared.
of Mount, Seated or serving on horseback or similarly; as, mounted police; mounted infantry., Placed on a suitable support, or fixed in a setting; as, a mounted gun; a mounted map; a mounted gem.
A Cavalry unit is made up of a, Regiment Squadron Platoon Troop Squad Unless of course they are a unit of Mounted Infantry, then they keep their normal Infantry sub-unit designations.
Spears in general between 1 and 2 Kilos. There was a variation between countries, between light infantry, heavy infantry and mounted units
William John Ottley has written: 'With mounted infantry in Tibet'
Is the word you're looking for "cavalry"? This is the general term for mounted troops. (In modern armies, it sometimes refers to mechanized divisions... i.e. tanks... rather than soldiers on actual horses.)
Their forces were basically armoured infantry (hoplites) and light infantry (peltasts). The Greek countryside was so poor it could not support horses, and only the upper class could afford them. So a Greek city-state army might have just 50 cavalry and 5 or 8 thousand hoplites. They covered their lack of cavalry by operating on rough ground/hillsides where foreign cavalry (eg the Persians) couldn't get at them. This changed with Alexander the Great who added sizeable cavalry forces to his infantry to match the Persian cavalry. The basis of his force was the infantry phalanx. On either flank he stationed a cavalry force, and linked them together with light infantry to fill the gap.
The mount is designed to be wall mounted on stud backed walls, made of drywall, plaster or paneling.
It's a good weapon to use against mounted cavalry that aren't protected by infantry, rendering them kind of useless.
No. The standard sniper rifle for the US was the 1903 Springfield, mounted with a telescopic sight. Later a version of the M-1 was scope mounted as well. All other nations that had snipers used their standard infantry rifle mounted with a telescopic sight.
No, they were just a different type of cavalry, usually mounted infantry armed with a sword or a carbine ( short light rifle )
All officers. In the infantry, sergeants also were supposed to have a sword. In the cavalry, mounted men of all ranks were supposed to have a saber.