A handful of states practice a non-binding primary, which may select candidates to a state convention which then selects delegates.
non binding arbitration
non obligat
In binding arbitration, the parties contractually agree that they will be bound and abide by the decision of the arbitrator. In non-binding arbitration, each party is free to reject the decision of the arbitrator and either do nothing or take the matter to court.
The answer depends on the party and the state. Some states have a non-binding primary, some states apportion their delegation according to the primary percentages and some states give all of their votes to the candidate who wins a plurality in the primary. Some parties have some "super delegates" who decide for themselves how to vote.
There is no doctrine of non-binding precedents. Non-binding opinions that may be used as guidelines for deciding future cases are called persuasive precedents. Binding precedents are upheld under the doctrine of stare decisis (Latin: Let the decision stand).
primary and non primary
primary and non primary
non binding arbitration
Non-binding arbitration
When something is non adjudicated it means it has not been legally decided. It is not binding, because it is not legally done.
Yes, arbitration is a formal though streamlined process. It is more streamlined that the standard litigation process. Never the less, the parties may choose whether the arbitration is to be binding or non-binding. If binding, the arbitrator's decision is final and the parties must comply with it. If non-binding, the parties may either accept the decision or reject it and pursue litigation.
it is a non foliated metamorphic texture.